Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />3. Variance-not greater than necessary to accomplish the landowner's objective: The ... <br />applicant could minimize the request by eliminating a portion of the porch addition ... <br />and the entry portion of the addition, This would require a 7 foot variance (33 feet <br />where, 40 feet is required), This design would not fit as well with the existing home, <br />The current house is slightly smaller than most of the homes in the neighborhood; <br />however, the addition would double the existing size, <br /> <br />Deadline for Agency Actions. The City of Arden Hills received the completed <br />application for this request on November 29, 1999, Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, <br />the City must act on this request by Thursday, January 27, 1999 (60 days), unless the City <br />provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The <br />additional review period would extend to Monday, March 27, 2000. The City may, with <br />the petitioners' consent, extend the review period beyond the Monday, March 27, 2000, <br />date, <br /> <br />The City informed the applicant that an additional 60 days would be needed to process <br />their application, <br /> <br />Lastly, if the City denies the petitioner's request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for <br />the denial at the time that it denies the request." <br /> <br />Recommendations. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case <br />#00-03, front yard setback variance (18 feet proposed, when 40 feet is required) for an <br />addition and porch based on the "Findings - Front Yard Setback Variance (addition)" <br />section of the staff report dated January 5, 2000, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Updates. Stlilf received one letter in support (see attached), <br /> <br />The plans show a separate living area (mother-in-Iaws apartment), This property is <br />currently zoned R-2, which allows single and two family dwelling writs, Two family <br />dwellings writs are allowed under a special use permit with a minimum of a 16,000 square <br />foot lot. The applicant's lot is 22,500 square feet. Staffwas not aware of this early enough <br />to include a Special Use Pennit as part of this application, Our current ordinance does not <br />prohibit the construction of this type of structure; however, it does prohibit the rental of this <br />area without a special use permit, At the time of a building permit for this type of structure <br />a condition would be placed on the permit that the structure not be rented without obtaining <br />a Special Use Permit. <br /> <br />Staff recommends a condition be added to this variance request that the apartment not be <br />rented without obtaining a Special Use Permit. <br /> <br />e <br />