Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ie <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />D. Development of Accepted Plan <br /> <br />Following the Arden Hills public mecting, Plan #6d was presented at a meeting of the Reutilization Committee. <br />Similar types offeedback were received, although the natural protection/open space position was more strongly and <br />vociferously represented at this meeting. <br /> <br />In the interest of gaining the Committee's support for the City's plan, the plarnring team made an additional set of <br />changes to Plan #6d, creating #6e (Figure 25). For the most part, these changes were fairly minor, involving <br />switching the locations of the golf course and some of the housing and tweaking other land-usc boundaries. No <br />significant changes were made in the amount of land devoted to any particular use. <br /> <br />This plan was accepted by the Committee and was presented at two additional public meetings sponsored by the <br />Committee in October 1995. <br /> <br />The Committee reconsidered its position after the public meetings, but ultimately decided that a plan very sunilar to <br />#6e was the most suitable consensus plan for reuse of TCAAP. This position is based on several factors: <br />. It represents a good compromise between the desires of the public for additional open space and the needs of <br />the City and County to generate revenues to pay for the expenses of converting and redeveloping the site. <br />. It sets aside the richest natural environments for preservation and recreation, while reserving already <br />industrialized areas for more intensive redevelopment. <br />. The Committee members felt they had devoted as much energy to the project as they could at this time. Further <br />debate about details would be fruitless at this point and therefore better left for later planning phases, which <br />would address many of those details. <br /> <br />Plan #6 "f' was approved by the Reutilization Committee on December 16, 1995, and forwarded to Congressman <br />Bruce Vento for follow-up actions at the federal level. <br /> <br />As of the date of this writing, this plan had not yet been approved by the Arden Hills TCAAP Reuse Task Force. <br /> <br />Comiras, LJd./SEH. Inc./LHDL, Ltd. <br /> <br />TeMP Framework Plan <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />Chapter V <br />