My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-22-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 02-22-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:57 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sectors 1 and 2 Restructuring Study <br />Metro TransR Volume II: Service Plan <br /> <br />e Chapter 7 <br />The Primary Transit Network: <br />Strategies for Maximum Ridership and Efficiency <br /> <br />The proposed service changes create a substantial network of services that run every 15 minutes <br />or better all day. A few other services have very intensive service during peak hours only. We <br />recommend referring to these lines collectively as lhe .Primary TransR Network" or PTN. Although <br />the PTN works together with other services, it differs profoundly from the rest of the system in two <br />several key respects: <br /> <br />. Ridership and Productivity Potential. The 15-minute headway represents the point at which <br />you no longer need to consult a schedule to use the service. It also pennits transfers to be <br />made rapidly even without timing of connections. For these reasons, these lines have the <br />greatest ridership potential. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Magnified Effect of Small Changes. On the PTN, the agency makes its most concentrated <br />investment Because of this, any changes that affect transR operations or attractiveness will be <br />magnified. An amenity - such as a shelter - placed on the PTN will probably be used by more <br />people, and will therefore have a greater positive impact, than the same sheRer placed <br />elsewhere. On the other hand, a delay imposed on a PTN line will cost the agency more, in <br />tenns of both running time and ridership, than the same delay imposed on a less frequent <br />service.5 <br /> <br />. Potential Synergy with Land Use. The level of service offered by the Primary TransR <br />Network makes R possible, even convenient, to live wRhout a car, or to have fewer cars than <br />adults in a household, or for a business to require fewer parking spaces. The PTN is also the <br />most cost-effective place to site any new transR-dependent development, in tenns of transR <br />costs, because a high level of service is already there. In general, the PTN requires density to <br />support the high level of service, and it also provides the opportunity for further denslflcation. <br /> <br />This chapter explores four areas of policy that apply particularly to the Primary Transit Network, <br />though many are also relevant to less frequent lines: <br /> <br />1. Protecting the PTN's Speed and Reliability <br />2. Marketing the PTN for Maximizing Ridership <br />3. Downtown Minneapolis Circulation Issues <br />4. Enhancing Ridership through Land Use Synergies <br />5. Expanding the PTN <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5 One key exception is any line that makes timed.transfer connections. If running times on these routes deteriorate to <br />the point that they can no longer cycle, a major increment in cost and inconvenience must be incurred to retain the <br />timed connections on which much of the suburban system relies. <br /> <br />Nelson \Nygaard ConsuRing <br /> <br />7-1 <br /> <br />November 2,1999 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.