CCP 02-22-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I .. I I and landscaped and generally made an attractive neighbor and community asset. New, reinforced storage bunkers would also help assure other investors that the operation is generally safe (especially given the site's long safety record). OfficelIndustrial: This is the only plan that shows a use pad that essentially accommodates Alliant Tech's existing building: the office/commercial area north of County H extended. The new entrance roadway could be curved slightly more to the south to leave Building 103 fully intact, with a small buffer space. This plan also contains the largest number of sites to which Alliant might reasonably move. Overall rating: Fair Town Center: The area designated for a town center could retain Building 103 in the near term. However, in the long term, retention of Building 103 would eliminate any possibility ofactually developing a real town center at this location. The company could relocate to the west or south, although these areas are designated for office/related uses of a less intense character, or to the special opportunity site. Overall rating: Fair Open Space: County H extended, which would serve as the principal collector on the site in this scenario, would run through Alliant Tech's present building. Again, the company could relocate to the west or south or to the special opportunity site. Overall rating: Poor Residential: The intersection of County H extended and the other principal on-site collector would be located within the Building 103 footpriot. Also, the number of site opportunities for relocating Alliant Tech has decreased, although the special opportunity site is still a possibility. Overall rating: Poor Fiscal and Financial Impacts FCl Will the development scheme he a net drain on or a net contributor to local taxing jurisdictions? Indicators . Extent of the tax base (revenues) provided for by uses in the plan. . Extent of the services (expenditures) demanded by uses in the plan. OfficeJIndustrial: At full buildout, this plan contains enough space to accommodate $1.1 billion in non-residential development, with a total tax capacity of about $50 million. This development would generate $8.9 million for the City of Arden Hills, as well as $56 million for the other two local taxing jurisdictions. Housing on the site would contribute another $1.3 million to the City and $8 million to the county and school district. Town Center: At full buildout, this plan would accommodate $469 million of non-residential development that would generate $3.7 million for the City and about $23 million for the other jurisdictions. Housing would contribute another $922,000 to the City and nearly $6 million to the county and school district. Open Space: At full buildout, this plan would hold about $220 million in non-residential development, excluding the sports complex. (Because of uncertainties as to how that complex might be developed, it was assigned a zero value.) This development would generate nearly $1.7 million for the City and more than $10 million for the county and school district. Housing would make a smaller contribution: $270,000 to the City, about $1.7 million total to the others. Residential: At full buildout, this plan would hold about $260 million in non-residential develop-ment, generating more than $2 million in City taxes and $13 million in taxes for the other juris-dictions. Housing would contribute another $1.7 million to the City and more than $10 million to the county and school district. Camiros, Ltd./SEH, Inc.lLHDL, Ltd. TCAAP Framework Plan Page 21 Chapter IV