My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-15-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 05-15-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />;",;'i. <br /> <br />.....,~~~'iI;';~9~SAND CUTBACK:t)JiH8:t~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Further Cutback Options <br /> <br />If the City is still outside a comfortable budget, a few items have been outlined that may be <br />considered for further cutbacks from the existing system design in this report. <br /> <br />Item One: Rednce Touch Panel <br /> <br />Reducing the touch panel or "big remote" will save about $800 and will reduce the amount of <br />control the staff and presenters have over the system, <br /> <br />Item Two: Less Expensive Cameras <br /> <br />The current cameras maintain a quality that is acceptable for cable casting. Savings could be <br />achieved by reducing the cameras to a lower quality camera system. The result of this <br />reduction is a lower quality image to the televised audience. Estimated cost reduction of the <br />two-camera system would be around $4,000. <br /> <br />Item Three: Less Expensive Rack Console Option <br /> <br />Cost savings can be achieved by using a simpler rack layout within the control room. The <br />result of this reduction would be essential pieces of equipment in the control room being <br />placed in awkward and potentially difficult locations for the operator. Also, some equipment <br />would not be mounted at all and would be placed somewhere in the control room. The <br />estimated cost reduction by using a less expensive rack console is $1,500. <br /> <br />Item Four: Reduced Cablecast Transitions <br /> <br />Reduction of the cablecast transitions to be able to "fade" between sow:ces to doing only <br />"cuts" between sOllIces would be a possible cutback. The result is a choppy presentation to <br />the cablecast audience. The estimated cost saving by reducing the cablecast transitions is <br />$4,000. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Item Five: Overhead Projection Only <br /> <br />As discussed during a council meeting with Dickson Stewart. substantial cost savings would <br />be achieved by abandoning the current reco=ended presentation design and install an <br />overhead projection system. This would involve eliminating the recommended presentation, <br />video display, and video processing modules, and reducing the control module by an <br />estimated $5,000. <br /> <br />The result would be a system similar to the existing system. It is important to note that the <br />cablecast cameras will not be able to present a clean picture of the overhead screen to the <br />cablecast audience. Reducing the budget modules described above will result in estimated <br />cost savings of $51,135. <br /> <br />The new pull-down overhead screen would be added to the architectural section of the <br />project. The estimated installed price for a pull-down screen is $2,700, and the overhead <br />projector would be $700. <br /> <br />Incorporating Item Five with the overhead screen and projector would result in an estimated <br />cost reduction of $47,735. <br /> <br />Electronic Interiors, Ine <br /> <br />10 <br />DRAFr <br /> <br />S~OI~31N[ JINO~lJ3l3 <br /> <br />May 9, 1999 <br /> <br />Zl/Zl 'd 998v'oN <br /> <br />~dlg:v OOOZ '6 '^e~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.