Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />F'Lt- <br /> <br />March 31, 2000 <br /> <br />Members of the City Council <br />City of Arden Hills, Minnesota <br /> <br />Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit <br /> <br /> <br />Our Responsibility Under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards <br /> <br />As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit <br />to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the fmancial statements are free of material ntisstaternent and are fairly <br />presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit is designed to provide reasonable assurance <br />of detecting ntisstatements that, in our professional judgment, would have a material effect on the fmancial statements taken <br />as a whole. Consequently, our audit will not necessarily detect ntisstatement less than this materiality level that ntigbt exist <br />due to error, fraudulent fmancial reporting or ntisappropriation of assets. <br /> <br />In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose fmancial statements of the City of Arden Hills for the year ended <br />December 31, 1999, we considered its internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of <br />expressing our opinion on the [mandaI statements and not to provide assurance on internal control. However, we noted <br />certain matters involving internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards <br />established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our <br />attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control that, in our judgment, could <br />adversely affect the City's ability to record, process, sununarize and report fmancial data consistent with the assertions of <br />management in the fmancial statements. <br /> <br />A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control <br />components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in <br />relation to the fmancial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the <br />normal course of performing their assigned functions. <br /> <br />Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that ntight be reportable <br />conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be a material <br />weakness, as defmed above. However, we noted the following reportable condition that we believe is not a material <br />weakness. <br /> <br />Segregation of Duties <br /> <br />Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of your office staff, your organization has limited <br />segregation of duties. A good internal control structure contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one <br />individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your organization is not large <br />enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this <br />condition. <br /> <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the fmancial statements are free of material ntisstatement, we <br />performed tests of compliance with certain provisions oflaws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective <br />of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. We noted no noncompliance with certain <br />provisions of laws, regulations, contract and grants. <br /> <br />'r <br />