Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />March 31, 2000 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Accounting Estimates <br /> <br />Accounting estimates are an integral part of the combined fmancial statements prepared by management and are based on <br />management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain <br />accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general purpose fmancial statements and <br />because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive <br />estimates affecting the financial statements was depreciation on fIxed assets. <br /> <br />Management's estimate of depreciation is based on estimated useful lives of the assets. We evaluated the key factors and <br />assumptions used to develop this estimate in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a <br />whole. <br /> <br />Significant Audit Adjustments <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards defme a significant audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the general <br />purpose fmancial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. We <br />proposed no material audit adjustments. <br /> <br />Disagreements with Management <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards defme a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not <br />resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a fmancial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the <br />general purpose fmancial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during <br />the course of our audit. <br /> <br />Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors <br /> <br />We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with <br />management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of <br />our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. <br /> <br />Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit <br />We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. <br /> <br />Other Matters <br /> <br />The folIowing are areas that came to our attention during the audit that we feel should be reviewed: <br /> <br />General Fund <br /> <br />The fund balance in the General fund increased $26,171 during 1999. Actual revenue was greater than budget by <br />$285,107. The total variance represents 11.2% of budget. The area with the greatest variance was nonbusiness licenses <br />and permits with a variance of $183,692. Expenditures were less than budget by $155,660. The total variance represents <br />6.6% of budget. Total transfers out totaled $598,500 or $415,950 more than budget. <br /> <br />Most of the general fund revenue comes from property taxes and property tax credits. They represent 72% of 1999 <br />revenue. This type of revenue is received during the second half of the year. As a result, a reserve for working capital <br />needs to be established equal to about 35 - 45% of planned expenditures and transfers out. The City has excellent reserves <br />for working capital from several sources. The amount designated for working capital in the general fund is $579,742. In <br />addition to the fund balance in the general fund, the City can also draw working capital from one of several permanent <br />capital projects funds which total about $8,100,000. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br />