Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />May 30, 2000 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />Planning Case File #00-22 <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Jennifer Chaput, Planner <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Planning Case #00-22, Special Use Permit Amendment <br />Fair Isaac <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Reouest <br />The applicant requests approval of an amendment to their Special Use Permit (SUP) for <br />an additional monument sign at the front of their building (Exhibit A) along the existing <br />private drive. The current sign does not adequately mark the property and, since the street <br />is not marked, there is insufficient signage to direct traffic to the facility. <br /> <br />Backl!round <br />The SUP on this property, approved in 1996, was originally intended for Control Data. <br />Since this time, the property has been divided up and Fair Isaac is only a portion of <br />property and the approved master plan. The overall plan allowed for signage along <br />Lexington Avenue at the same level as it existed in 1996. This limited the property to <br />one pylon sign at that location for Control Data. <br /> <br />Fair Isaac currently has a pylon sign along Lexington Avenue, directing traffic to its <br />facility. This sign rests on the comer of Lexington and a private drive. The facility faces <br />the private drive. Therefore, the applicant wishes to put up a sign in front ofthe building <br />(on an island by the street) so that its location is more recognizable. The sign ordinance <br />allows for one freestanding sign for each frontage along a public street. Although this is <br />not a public street, it was evaluated according to that standard. There are at least two <br />frontages along this street, allowing for at least two freestanding signs. <br /> <br />The proposed sign meets the square footage and height requirements of the code. The <br />setbacks were not required to be met since the sign is not being located along a public <br />right-of-way. <br /> <br />. <br />