CCP 06-26-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 7, 2000 9 accessory structures since this would meet what the Planning Commission was trying to accomplish. Commissioner Baker asked if a minimum size should be set to the accessory structures and what exactly was considered to be an accessory structure, City Planner Chaput stated that a definition was proposed and that accessory structures are used secondary to the main structure. The Commission came to a consensus to request staff to revise the language as stated above and bring the Zoning Ordinance Amendments before the Commission for a public hearing in July, PLANNING CASE #00-28 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - WATER TOWERS' ANTENNA MASTER PLAN (DISCUSSION ONLYl City Planner Chaput explained that Staff has been directed by the City Council to review the City's water tower antenna locations and establish a "master plan" of how to handle requests for the location oftelecommunication antennas on the tower and their ground-related structures. At their regular meeting on May 8, 2000, the City Council passed Resolution 00-20 to direct staff to no longer accept applications for the location of telecommunication antenna and ground structures on the water towers in Arden Hills. The intent of the resolution was for the City to develop a long term plan for the water tower sites, guiding future applications. The City has two water towers: Red Fox Road and Femwood Avenue North, City Planner Chaput presented a list of the applications by telecommunications companies and location on the water towers to date. The Red Fox water tower already has at least three ground mounted structures to support the antennas on the tower (on the top and side). It is difficult to plan how to use the ground space more effectively and better, aesthetically, since it is already developed in this manner. However, recommendations for a better overall screening plan or landscaping plan could be made so that landscaping does not continue to have to be moved to accommodate another applicant. The Fernwood water tower has one ground mounted structure. A different recommendation could be made on this site for either landscaping or housing ground mounted structures in one facility at the base of the tower. City Planner Chaput indicated that an overall plan needs to be established for both properties. She presented information regarding each site related to zoning, land use plan, and size. She advised there have been a number of companies that have expressed interest in potential co-location of antennas on the City's water towers. With these applications, ground structures are necessary, utilizing the land surrounding the water towers. Currently, the City does not have a plan for the ground structures or antennas that may be located on or around the water tower, City Planner Chaput stated she has contacted a number of cities to review how they dealt with applications for antennas on City water towers. She received information back from Shoreview, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Wayzata, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, and Long Lake. She also requested information from the League of Minnesota Cities on this topic. Generally, cities seem to deal with antennas on City water towers through an administrative review process, often requiring a building permit or special form for review by staff. The City of Shoreview uses the administrative review process and provides a lot of useful information