My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-10-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 07-10-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - June 26, 2000 <br /> <br />D""'" P. F'"'T <br />~ . '" r'b.:*;' 1" \i tt'a ~',; <br />',d' L ";h If~ ~ <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked whether funding for the audio/visual component will be provided .. <br />by the cable service franchise fee fund. Mr. Lynch confirmed this. ,., <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she would hesitate before spending if money for this project <br />is not allocated from such a fund. She added that the City's residents deserve the best technology <br />which has not been provided lately and previously. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated the budget proposal does not even include the best technology, but <br />funds have not been spent on communications for several years. She added, in her opinion, it is <br />the least the City should be doing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked whether the proposed system will be sufficient for the future <br />of the facility. Councilmember Grant stated a minimum amount of necessary funding was <br />maintained to keep the system modular so future upgrades would be possible. Mayor Probst <br />stated it will be a great system and far above what is currently in place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem expressed concern that the amount of money proposed for the City Hall <br />project is excessive in comparison with other things which the City needs, such as a new public <br />works facility. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that it was originally believed, when the efforts for a new City Hall facility <br />began, that the project could be completed for much less money than is currently under <br />discussion. He added that the construction industry has changed considerably, and short of e <br />redesigning the building and reducing the plans, there is little that can be done about the cost. He <br />expressed his belief that it is a good value for the building being proposed, and it is a 50-year <br />decision for the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that some residents had expressed concerns that the City should continue to <br />lease a facility. He added it could quickly be demonstrated that this would not be cost effective. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that a City Hall facility is important as it provides a community with a sense <br />of place and a notion of local government. He added he is a strong advocate of the project, and <br />he will do everything in his power to ensure that construction proceeds in a timely manner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated, in her opinion, a smaller building could be constructed for <br />less money. She added, however, the Council should do its best to ensure that the project is <br />completed, and hopefully the fee title will come through soon. She noted the community's <br />enthusiasm will lessen as the project lengthens. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked whether a financial analysis had been completed on the project. <br />Mayor Probst stated that a formal cost evaluation had not been completed as the City has been in <br />a cash position to pay for the building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson expressed his support of the City Hall project, adding it will be a nice <br />quality building which will be around for 50 years. He added that residents will take pride in the <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.