My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-15-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 08-15-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:11 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:25:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memorandum, City Hall Bid Results <br />Page Three <br />June 22, 2000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternate B. Construction of a Left Hand Turn Lane off Hil!:hwav 96 (in the amount <br />of $16.000) <br />After discussion, it was the consensus to include Alternate B as part of the construction <br />bid, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternates No.2 and 3 (Variations of Window Styles for the Second Floor (at a cost <br />of $16.000 and $25,000 rcsvectivelv) <br />After discussion, it was the consensus to include Alternate No, 3, in an amount of <br />$25,000, as part ofthe construction bid, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternate No. A (Installation of a Twelve Inch (12") Watermain from Hamline <br />Avenue to City Hall (in the amount of $16.000) <br />The purpose ofthis pipe up sizing was to accommodate future cross connections to the <br />City of Shoreview for emergency purposes, <br /> <br />Public Works Director Stafford and City Administrator Lynch met with representatives <br />of the City of Shoreview regarding this opportunity, but the City of Shoreview did not <br />express any interest, due to the apparent prohibitive cost oftunneling under Lexington <br />A venue, Without the cost sharing of the City of Shoreview, a twelve-inch line is not be <br />feasible for Arden Hills to pursue. Mr. Stafford indicates that a six inch (6") line would <br />be sufficient for City Hall purposes, installation of an eight inch (8") line would allow for <br />future expansion, and potential cross-connection to our own line, Mr. Stafford <br />recommends installation of the eight-inch (8") line in conjunction with the City Hall <br />infrastructure construction. This is part of the base bid, and will not increase or decrease <br />the construction bid. <br /> <br />After discussion, it was the consensus of City Councilmembers to authorize installation <br />of an eight-inch (8") water line as part of the construction bid. <br /> <br />. Alternate No.!, allowinl!: for brick masonry. rather than stone masonry (a votential <br />deduct of $315.000) <br />Mr. Vesterholt and Ms, Sterner reviewed the two (2) options, advantages and <br />disadvantages of stone and/or brick masonry. <br /> <br />After extensive discussion of both options, budgetary concerns and aesthetics, it was the <br />consensus of City Councilmembers to ratify inclusion of the stone masonry, ratber than <br />the deduct for brick masonry as part of the construction bid, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.