Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memorandum, City Hall Bid Results <br />Page Two <br />June 22, 2000 <br />The alternates in 2000 included the following: <br />Alternate No.2 = Add $16,000 <br />Add second tloor windows of a <br />different style and height than <br />the windows on the first floor; <br />Alternate No.3 = Add $25,000 <br />Add second tloor windows of the <br />same style and height as the first floor <br />Alternate A = Add $16,000 <br />Install a 12" watermain from Hamline <br />A venue to City Hall <br />Alternate B = Add $16,000 <br />Construct left hand turn lane otf <br />Highway 96 <br />Total of Alternates = $73,000 <br /> <br />Without any of the Alternates, less the deduct on Alternate No, 1, makes the total project costs: <br /> <br />Base Bid <br />Stone Masonry (Deduct) <br />Total Project Costs <br />(without other alternates) <br /> <br />1999 <br />$3,062,600 <br />(313,000) <br /> <br />$2,749,000 <br /> <br />2000 <br />$3,293,500 <br />(315,000) <br /> <br />$2,978,500 <br /> <br />How does this compare to the Architect's Estimate? <br />The original architect's estimate as $2,500,000, If you took the proposed apparent low bid <br />amount of $2,735,000 and deducted the $315,000 amount to have brick instead of masonry, you <br />would have a cost of $2,420,000, If you add back in the municipal utility work, which is the <br />sanitary sewer and water connection, you arrive at a cost of $2,586,000, which is approximately <br />$86,000 higher than the architect's estimate, <br /> <br />Further Discussion Items <br />At the City Council's June 19,2000 Worksession, the consensus of the City Council was for the <br />tollowing Alternate considerations for the construction of the project: <br />