Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />proposing a holding pond but more on the order of the drawings you <br />provided to the Council. <br /> <br />Pronosed Water main/Sanitarv Sewer Imnrovements <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Watermain <br /> <br />What do you mean by the statement "The proposed roadways will <br />have different curb lines and widths from the existing streets..."? If <br />the roadway widths are to remain the same, what do you mean by <br />the statement "...and some existing hydrant locations may conflict <br />with the new roadway locations."? If the roadway widths are the <br />same, why would the hydrants need to be moved? <br /> <br />Proiect Costs/Proiect Funding <br /> <br />Proiect Costs <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Considering the streets widths have not been increased, streets will <br />not be dug up to install a new storm sewer and other changes are <br />being made, all of which should decrease construction costs, I am <br />having a very hard time understanding your costs. An item of <br />special concern is the "contingency" cost. Please defme what a <br />"contingency" cost is. Your 1999 feasibility report identifies a 10% <br />contingency cost for each street. Your 2000 report identifies a 15% <br />contingency cost. How do you justify this 5% increase! <br /> <br />The following is a cost comparison. The 1999 costs are from your <br />November 1999 report <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />C\ <br />