Laserfiche WebLink
<br />underground pipeline (possibly filled with concrete) that is running tlu-ough the <br />property. The consolidation would also give the owners the ability to build a larger <br />single family home by avoiding the easement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. Staff docs not believe that the proposed consolidation will negatiyely affect the <br />health, safety or general welfare of residents in the area. <br /> <br />Table 1: Lot Requirements <br /> <br />! I Zoning r 3295 Katie 3301 Katie combined-l <br /> Reouirements Court Court <br /> Zoning District R-3 R-3 R-3 -------, <br /> R-3 . <br /> Current Use --- Vacant Vacant Single Family , <br /> Home <br /> Lot AreaTsa. ft-:') 11,000 11,475 12,199 23,674 <br /> Lot Width(ft-:1 85 85 75 160 <br /> Lot Denth (ft.) 120 135 135 135 <br /> Front Yard Setback 7ft:) , 30* <br /> --- --- --- <br /> Rear Yard Setback(ft-:1 30 --- --- --- <br />. Side Yard Setback (ft.2 5/15 --- --- --- <br /> <br />*Afront yard variance was granted by the City Council in 1983 to allow for a Ji'ont yard <br />setback of 30 feet rather than the required 40 feet for all development in the Katie Court <br />area. <br /> <br />Deadline for A!!encv Actions <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 23, <br />2000. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by October <br />21,2000 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an <br />additional GO-day review period. The additional review period would extend to <br />December 20, 2000. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review period <br />beyond the, Deccmber 20, 2000 date. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for <br />the denial at the time it denies the request." <br /> <br />ODtions <br />1. Recommends approval as submitted. <br />2. Recommends approyal with conditions. <br />3. Recommends denial with reasons for denial. <br />4. Table for additional information. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br />The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #00-35, lot <br />consolidation of two parcels, 3295 and 3301 Katie Court, into one parcel, with the <br />following reasons: <br />1. The application is able to meet the criteria for consolidation as outlined in Section 22- <br />12, (e) of the City Code; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />