Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 30, 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />T <br />E <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated that a consumer group would be helpful in determining the appcaranec and <br />contcnt of a wcbsite, and a group of residents would be etIective in that regard. Hc addcd that <br />such tasks would be different from what was originally planned fe)]' the Task Forcc. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that the Task Force was established by thc Council, and it would be <br />appropriate for the Task Force to come back to the Council rather than staff. He added the <br />Council should decide to ask the Task Force to proceed with their work or turn it over to staff. <br /> <br />Council member Larson suggested the Council move forward and decide ,vhether to accept the <br />Task Force's recommendation to proceed with a websitc. He added that the next step is to <br />instruct staff to determine implementation ofa websitc. He noted that the Task Force might play <br />a role in the implementation, and agreed that some dccisions might not be appropriate tor a <br />citizen group. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Rcm reitcrated that staff s memo of August 14 included specific <br />rccommcndations for the CowlCil from the Task Force on which they had hoped to receive <br />fccdback. She added that the Council's consensus was that the Task Force was formed to <br />provide recommendations and not to make decisions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated, in hcr opinion, the issue should be discussed marc <br />thoroughly. She added it is premature to dissolve thc Task Force, which might be expanded or <br />changed to assist staff with the creation of a website. She noted the issue could be reviewed at an <br />e upcoming worksession. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmcmber Larson seconded a motion to <br />table the acceptance of the Website Task Force's recommendation to establish a <br />website, and to disband the Task Force, until further discussion by the Council. <br />The motion calTied unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ASSOCIA nON m' METRO PO LIT AN MUNICIP ALITlES (AMM) POLICIES <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated that the minutes of the October 16 Council work session did not record Item IV- <br />K, Mctropolitan Council, as a priority for the AMM. lIe added it is identified as a <br />recommendation in the staff memo dated October 24. He notcd the Council should resolvc <br />whether it is a priority. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that if the Council agrced upon the issue and it is recorded in the <br />minutcs, the memo to the AMM should be amended to reflect this. Mr. Lynch agreed, adding the <br />memo has not been officially submitted. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst cCJ!1culTed with the meeting minutes, adding he supports the inclusion ofItem IV- <br />K, Metropolitan Council, as a priority. <br /> <br />e <br />