My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 10-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:25 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:35:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 3, 2001 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />they could place sidewalks would infringe upon the wetland areas, and that would not be <br />kgal. <br /> <br />Chair Baker asked if there were any City trails planned for this area. Mr. Parrish replied <br />there was a proposal to place a trail along New Brighton Road. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitseh stated the foot traffic was a serious concern for this area. <br />She stated this was a very busy area, but putting in sidewalks was not necessarily going <br />to resolve this issue at this time. She stated something needed to be done in this area. <br />She stated the bridge was at a very awkward angle and asked when the bridge was due to <br />be reconstructed and at that point, would this area be made safer. Mr. Parrish replied he <br />did not have that information, but he did not believe the bridge would be reconstructed <br />anytime soon. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchene asked if the students would be driving back and forth to the <br />campus every day. Mr. Kunkel replied he did not have that information, but he did <br />believe some students would be driving daily. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pakulski moved, seconded by Commissioner Sand, to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case #01-22, Beacon Construction, County Road E2 and Cleveland, <br />rezoning the Neighborhood Business and R-I to R-4 Multiple Dwelling, Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment from Neighborhood business to high density residential, and the Master <br />Plan Planned unit development, and final planned unit development/site plan review for <br />the following reasons and the following conditions: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends rezoning the property from Neighborhood <br />Business and R -1 to R -4 Multiple Dwelling, be approved based on the following <br />findings: <br /> <br />1. The property will be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan upon approval a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment; <br />2. Substantive changes have occurred making the zoning change necessary; <br />3. The change is superior to the current zoning <br />4. Development conditions or priorities make the existing Zoning and/or comprehensive <br />plan impractical. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends that a comprehensive plan amendment from <br />Neighborhood Business to High Density Residential, be approved based on the following <br />findings: <br /> <br /> I. <br /> 2. <br /> 3. <br /> 4. <br />. 5. <br /> <br />The amendment will have a limited overall impact on the community; <br />The amendment furthers the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; <br />Sufficient physical and natural features in the area minimize the impact to adjacent <br />properties; <br />Adequate public services and utilities are available to effectively serve development <br />on the property. <br />The amendment will have no material impacts on any water bodies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.