CCP 10-29-2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 3, 2001 The Planning Commission recommends that the Master Plan Planned Unit Development, --'lndEinaU'lanned Unit Developm~ite Plan review be apprQyed with the following conditions: I. An application for minor subdivision and consolidation be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 2. A permit system for parking, approved by the City, be utilized if the City determines that parking is not adequate; 3. The "Laundry/Community Room" illustrated in the garage floor plan be replaced with two parking spaces. 4. An easement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney be provided for the existing lift station on the property; 5. The applicant complies with any recommended changes provided by the City Engineer; 6. The applicant obtains all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Water Shed District; 7. Compliance with the applicable provisions ofthe Zoning Ordinance 8. The applicant submits a landscape performance bond or other surety for 125% of the cost of materials and installation valid one full year from the date of installation prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. The applicant provides a sign easement for gateway signage near the intersection of County Road E2 and Cleveland with an area, dimension, and at a location approved by City staff. 10. The City Engineer review and approve the design and access to Cleveland Avenue. 11. A lighting plan be submitted for staff review and approved by the Council. 12. The design and location for anyon-premise signage be approved by the City staff. 13. That after the end of the Bethel College supervised use of the development, any subsequent use be offered only at a market rate. 14. A written Pun agreement acceptable to the City be submitted prior to approval of the final Planned Unit Development. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). Chair Baker recessed the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Chair Baker reconvened the meeting at 9:03 p.m. CASE #01-23 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. SIGN ORDINANCE - PUBLIC HEARING Chair Baker opened the public hearing at 9:04 p.m. Staff reviewed their report dated September 26,2001 and recommended approval for the reasons contained therein noting staff was recommending in District 4, the wall maximum area be 60 square feet, not 100 square feet. The freestanding max area would be 80 square feet, not 100 square feet. In District 5, the wall max area would be 80 square feet, not 100 square feet with the freestanding max would remain the same. In District 6, the wall max area would be 60 square feet, not 100 square feet and the freestanding max area would be 45 square feet, not 100 square feet. Commissioner Galatowitsch stated she wanted to see language III Section X that addressed both new and existing signs, not just new signs. 6 e . .