My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-26-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 11-26-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />Memo to City Council <br />Planning Case #01-22: Arden South Apartments <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />following: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I. Provided a traffic review comparing traffic generated by a multi-family use <br />compared with an office use that was previously contemplated on the property. <br />Office is a permitted use within the neighborhood business zoning district. This <br />information is contained in the applicant's November 19, 2001 letter. <br />2. Three alternative site plans for the Council's consideration. <br /> <br />Since the alternative plans were submitted on November 20, 2001, and given the short <br />work week, it should be noted that staff did not have the opportunity to review the :plans <br />on a detailed basis. The applicant has highlighted some of the plusses and minuses for <br />each potential option. The following can be readily noted: <br /> <br />Option #2: Relocate north parking spaces to the west and move building southeast <br /> <br />. This option contemplates a 20 foot rear yard setback where 30 feet is typically <br />required. Since the applicant is requesting approval for a Planned Unit <br />Development, a formal variance would not be required. <br />. No parking is located on the northern portion of the property reducing the impact <br />to significant trees on the site. Parking is relocated to the southern portion of the <br />property. <br />. Access is located north of the lift station, closer to Cleveland Avenue. Based on A <br />the attached memo from Ramsey County Traffic Engineer Dan Soler, access to ., <br />this property should be as south on Cleveland Avenue as possible. <br />. Access and entrance to under ground parking are not directly aligned. <br />. The building entrance is more directly oriented toward the parking. <br /> <br />Option #3: Relocate north parking spaces and move building southwest <br /> <br />. This plan contemplates a 5 foot parking setback where 20 feet is typically <br />required. Since the applicant is requesting approval for a Planned Unit <br />Development, a formal variance would not be required. <br />. No parking is located on the northern portion of the property reducing the impact <br />to significant trees on the site. Parking is relocated to the southern and western <br />portions of the property. <br />. Access is located north of the lift station, closer to Cleveland Avenue. The access <br />to this property should be as far south on Cleveland Avenue as possible. <br />. Access and entrance to under ground parking are not directly aligned. <br />. The building entrance is more directly oriented toward the parking. <br />. There are eight parking stalls less than the originally proposed plan. <br /> <br />Option #4: Flip building and parking areas <br /> <br />. This plan contemplates a 20 foot building setback where 40 feet is typically e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.