Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />96 percent agreed or strongly agreed that the newsletter was an effective communication <br />tool. (See survey results outline in Appendix B of the attached final paper.) <br /> <br />--Specific findings: However, when it came to specifics, respondents were less positive, <br />Items eight through 18 on the survey asked readers whether they felt the newsletter was <br />providing them with adequate information on the following specific topics: City Council <br />action, community business development, parks and recreation, roadway development, <br />environmental issues, city elections, city services, city ordinances, permit application <br />procedures, committees and task forces, and finance, Response scores were lower across <br />the board in this section of the survey, No item rated an overall response of "strongly <br />agree," On many items the response hovered in the "neutral" or "no opinion" category. <br /> <br />The survey also contained two open-ended questions to which respondents could supply <br />written comments, The questions related to how the content and the format ofthe <br />newsletter could be improved, <br /> <br />In summarizing all the survey responses, I saw a few, basic themes emerge, <br /> <br />. Readers want the newsletter to be delivered to them consistently, at the same time <br />each month, Respondents did not give the newsletter particularly high marks in <br />the "timeliness" category, and a number of the written comments referred to the <br />fact that the letter does not arrive at the same time each month, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Readers want the newsletter to offer more detail and to discuss issues as they <br />emerge rather than merely reporting City Council decisions after action has taken <br />place, <br /> <br />. Readers would like some minor revisions in format Specifically, they asked for <br />more charts, graphs, diagrams and maps, (Readers feel that this is particularly <br />important when we're communicating information about highway and street <br />projects that are often difficult to describe in text alone,) <br /> <br />The survey also contained a question about the desirability of a city web site and asked <br />residents for their reactions to the cable TV channel. About 67 percent of respondents <br />reported that they had Internet access, and about 41 percent said they're access city <br />information from a web site, <br /> <br />Only 6,5% strongly agreed that the cable TV channel was a major source of city <br />information for them, <br /> <br />It should be pointed out that the group of people who returned the survey was not <br />necessarily representative of the city demographically, The response group was over- <br />represented by middle-age and older residents and by people who had lived in Arden <br />Hills for 10 or more years, <br /> <br />e <br />