My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 01-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:30 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 3, 2001 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput indicated the Zoning Ordinance lists a number of different dwelling types that are <br />permitted in various districts of the City. She continued by stating typically, multiple family or . <br />two-family dwelling units are the more appropriate dwelling type to mix with a business in a <br />district such as this. Ms. Chaput noted that since this is a business district, some restrictions <br />should be placed on permitting dwelling units as a sole use on a property. She noted, dwelling <br />units should be mixed with a business use to ensure that the use continues to meet the intent of <br />the district and the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput explained, currently, the neighborhood business district does not permit any types of <br />dwelling units. She stated all of the dwelling unit types, and their corresponding district <br />regulations, are shown in the "Dwelling" section of the Land Use Chart, Section 5 (E), below. <br />Ms. Chaput indicated staff proposes that "Multiple Family" and "Two-Fanlily" dwellings be <br />allowed in the neighborhood business district through a special use permit. She stated that by <br />making this use a special use in the district, an additional restriction can be placed on it to ensure <br />that dwelling units can not be the sole use on the property, as proposed in Section 5 (H) #3. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput reported that by adding in certain dwelling units as permitted uses in this district, <br />other language Section 5 (H) needs to be addressed. She noted this is specific to where the text <br />references certain requirements when "adjacent to residential uses". Ms. Chaput explained this <br />could have negative implications to a development if the language is not anlended to ensure that <br />the residential reference applies to uses outside of the NB District. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput stated at the previous Planning Cormnission, staff was asked to define the use <br />"Mixed Residential Types", as shown in the Land Use Chart. She indicated staff did not locate <br />this term anywhere else within the Zoning Ordinance and was able to find a definition to match it <br />from Ordinances of surrounding communities. Ms. Chaput stated staffrecormnends that this term <br />be stricken from the Zoning Ordinance instead of proposing a definition that may indirectly <br />include or prohibit certain uses. She added it also appears that there is some uncertainty in what <br />this term should mean, creating a great deal of difficulty in developing a definition. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput reviewed the overall additions and changes of the proposed amendments to the <br />Zoning Ordinance and noted staff recommends approval of Plamling Case #00-41, anlending <br />Section 5 of the Zoning Ordinance #291 as presented in the "Proposed Amendments to Section 5 <br />ofthe Zoning Ordinance" section of this memorandum. <br /> <br />Cormnissioner Sand asked that the residential zoning districts be added to Section 5 of the <br />Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Chaput noted this change would be completed as it was an oversight. <br /> <br />Chair Baker closed the public hearing at 10:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Baker indicated he was comfortable with the language changes within this Ordinance. He <br />stated this allows for those difficult parcels near residential areas to be developed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch moved, seconded by Cormnissioner Zirmnerman, to approve <br />Planning Case #00-41, Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Section 5 (E) Land Use Chart and (II) <br />#3, Special Requirements for the Neighborhood Business District of the Zoning Ordinance #291 <br />as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />REPORTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.