My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 01-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:30 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br />:e <br /> <br />. <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />-- <br />. <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />4t <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />John Shardlow <br />December 4, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />finalized. Specific concerns are the 242 westbollnd left turns at the west 1-35W interchange and <br />the inbound trips in the morning peak period. These may be critical in terms of the existing <br />geometries. With proposed geometries, the number of lanes over 1-35W is significantly <br />iucreased and there is Jane continuity between Highway 10 and Old Highway 8. Additionally, <br />potential development of an interchange between Highway 10 and County Road 96 would <br />reduce the conflicts significantly and makll that route more attractive, potentially reducing some <br />of the traffic volumes and potential problems through the 1-3SW imer<;:hange. <br /> <br />Since the volume of traffic and the sqllare footage of development falls below that which was <br />found acceptable in the BRW report, it appears that the concept would not create traffic problems <br />that cannot be resolved. However, as the concept continues to be developed, some additional <br />study of traffic should be made. Specifically, existing traffic volumes at the Round Lake Road <br />and County Road 96 intersection should be counted and also the volumes at both ramps of 1-35W <br />and Couuty Road 96. The forecasted traffic volumes from the Gateway Business Center should <br />then be added to these three intersection volumes and a capacity level of service analysis made. . <br />Additionally, the BRW report was based on 52 acres of development in the south end of ROllnd <br />Lake Road, Preliminary analysis of the additional acreage available after development of the <br />Gateway Business Center indicates that much of it is in wetlands or is difficult to build on. This <br />would somewhat lhnit the additional traffic, beyond the Gateway Business Center, that cOllld be <br />added to existing volumes. <br /> <br />Contact should be made with both Ramsey County and MnlDOT relative to the operation of the <br />intersections along County Road 96. It would be appropriate to begin this as soon as possible so <br />any potential traffic concerns can be resolved. <br /> <br />If you have questions on our brief evaluation or comments, please call me. <br /> <br />$ah <br />Q: Cynthia Dnl.ke, SEn <br />Mike Martinez, SEn <br />\~f1kgl\<:;C1T...IC.':\WF\pr(lP."h>ci~\QJ01'll:\d1rs!d\Q.....l104.dll.;: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.