CCP 02-26-2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANl\TING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2001 3 . Commissioner Erickson questioned if the applicant was aware of the conditions and ifthere was any concerns. Ms. Chaput stated the applicant was aware of the conditions and indicated no concerns have been noted to date. Chair Baker indicated he felt the proof of parking was a little shaky at this time with Flaherty's Arden Bowl. He asked that the applicant provide the City with a more concrete agreement between the two parties to show proof ofthe number of additional parking stalls provided off site. Mr. Unrah indicated he would work on this issue with Flaherty's, Chair Baker questioned if the addition to the existing structure would match the current building materials. Mr. Unrah stated the materials would be similar in style and texture, Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Sand, to recommend approval of Plalliling Case #01,01, Site Plan Review, for Corporate Express at 1233 West County Road E, with the following conditions: 3. 4. . 5, 6. 7. I. The dock addition must be no closer than 18 feet from the year property line; 2. All parking stalls and drive aisles must be set back five feet from the property line; therefore, the six parking stalls and drive aisle proposed at the rear of the building must be eliminated, the area reconfigured to meet the Ordinance and the parking stalls relocated on site; No additional landscape area may be taken for parking space reconfiguration; The applicant must accommodate two additional handicap parking stalls on site (total of four) as per the Building Code; All fencing must be located within the property lines, constructed of chain, link to a height acceptable to the applicant and agreed to by staff; electric and barb wire fencing is not permitted; and Application for a building permit must be made with the Building Inspector. The applicant will provide an agreement between Corporate Express and Flaherty's Arden Bowl stating the number of additional parking stalls provided off site. The motion carried unanimously (6,0). This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, February 26,2001, City Council meeting. PLANNING CASE # 01-02 - GUIDANT CORPORATION - PUD AMENDMENT/SITE PLAN REVIEWIHEIGHT VARIANCE - 4100 HAMLINE AVENUE - PUBLIC HEARING Chair Erickson opened the public hearing at 7:51 p.m, . Ms. Chaput explained that the applicant is requesting an amendment to Guidant's Master Planned Unit Development for a change in the location of a parking ramp, as it exists on the current Master PUD, and a two level office addition, Building 1. She noted application for site plan review of the proposed parking ramp has also been made. Ms. Chaput stated the proposed ramp exceeds the maximum height permitted in the 1,1 Zoning District, requiring a height vanance. Ms. Chaput indicated the Plalliled Unit Development (PUD) for the CPI campus was originally approved by the City in July of 1991 in Planning Case 89,10 and later amended with Planning