Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2001 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />Chair Baker reviewed the "Lot Area, Lot Width, and Yard Requirements" section and asked if <br />there were any concerns with the change to identify the lot area is one acre minimum, He asked <br />ifthe number oflots can be reduced, Mr. McClure stated he cannot imagine more than two lots, <br />Mr. Shardlow stated they would agree to a maximum of up to one lot. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Erickson asked if Arden Hills considered parking decks to be accessory uses, Ms, <br />Chaput stated the Code does not define parking structures, However, in the Guidantproject, <br />parking structures were being looked at according to surface parking regulations, not as <br />accessory structures,. She advised that the parking setback is 50 feet in the Gateway Business <br />District but the accessory structure setback is only 10 feet and not permitted within front yards, <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow stated they need to know the City would agree to allow parking areas within the 50 <br />foot front yard setback, <br /> <br />Chair Baker asked if the City Engineer would address the issues related with drive-thru lanes, <br />Ms, Chaput stated a drive-thru lane would require a SUP process so that would be reviewed <br />anyway, even with a PUD. <br /> <br />Mr. Dowdy estimated that an eight story high building would be approximately 100 feet high <br />although he could not be certain as each story may vary between ten and twenty feet, depending <br />on what type of tenant that the building is constructed for. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch stated she is concerned that an eight-story building would appear to <br />be a "Goliath" since there is nothing like it for miles, She expressed concern that it would not . <br />blend into the area and asked if there will be a similar project across the street. <br /> <br />Mr. McClure stated their hope is to provide flexibility to users in the marketplace while keeping <br />in mind the size constraints of this building envelope, He stated he would not be adverse to <br />consider lower profile buildings with bigger floor plates if there were not so much wetland, <br />However, the developable envelope of this project is very squeezed, Mr, McClure stated he <br />thinks one ofthe strong appeals is that this site is at I-35W and 1-694 and the presence it would <br />provide to the prospective user, He stated this site sits substantially below the road elevation, at <br />least 15 feet, so the first floor elevation would be about the same elevation as Gateway <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />Mr, McClure stated if they have to limit the height, they will not get the tenants they desire, <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch stated it appears their concern is that it would cut into their <br />profitability. <br /> <br />Mr. McClure stated a tenant may request larger square footage to accommodate their entire <br />business operation. He commented on the difficulty oftrying to anticipate all the issues that can <br />come up once a tenant is identified, <br /> <br />Mr. Dowdy stated the Normanpoint project is eight to nine stories high and on a similar site, He . <br />noted the building shape depicted on the plan is only a concept. <br /> <br />Mr. McClure stated a lot of the larger users of single-tenant buildings are between 200,000 and <br />250,000 square feet and the typical floor plates are 20,000 to 30,000 square feet per floor plate. <br />