Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2001 <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />Ms, Chaput noted that Figure 7,1 of the Comprehensive Plan, as adopted, does not correctly <br />match the identified "Community Gateways" in the Parkway System Feasibility Study. The <br />Comprehensive Plan map does not identify the comer of Lexington Avenue and County Road E <br />or the comer of County Road E2 and Cleveland Avenue as a "Community Gateways," Figure <br />7.1 ofthe Comprehensive Plan does not match the Parkway System Feasibility Study map due to <br />these errors, Ms, Chaput explained that Figure 7,1 has been anlended to identify all of the <br />locations shown in the Parkway System Feasibility Study, <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput presented the Commission's options for consideration of this application and advised <br />that Staffrecommends approval of the amendment of Figure 7,1, Road Classifications, of the <br />1998 Comprehensive Plan to correct the locations of the identified "Community Gateways," <br />reflecting the findings of the 1985 Parkway System Feasibility Study. <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput advised that the Metropolitan Council is still reviewing the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan, She stated she did mention to them that one ofthe maps needed to be amended and they <br />indicated that would not be a problem or slow their review, <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman noted the "Gateway" indication is not on County Road E, Ms, <br />Chaput explained that the wording "County Road E" is in the wrong location and will be <br />corrected, <br /> <br />Chair Baker closed the public hearing at 9: 17 p,m, <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchenes moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case #01-06, City of Arden Hills, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, for <br />the amendment of Figure 7.1, Road Classifications, ofthe 1998 Comprehensive Plan to correct <br />the locations of the identified "Community Gateways," reflecting the findings of the 1985 <br />Parkway System Feasibility Study, as shown in Exhibit A with the correction that the wording <br />"County Road E" be correctly placed on the map, The motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> <br />This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, March 26,2001, City Council meeting, <br /> <br />REPORTS <br /> <br />A. Council Liaison <br /> <br />Since Councilmember Aplikowski was no longer present, Councilmember Rem reported on the <br />annual Council retreats, She advised that the Corporate Express application was approved and <br />the Walgreens application was tabled due to concerns with traffic and access, Councilmember <br />Rem advised that there has also been additional discussion with the County on what would be <br />acceptable to them. <br /> <br />B. Planning Commissioners <br /> <br />There were no report from the Planning Commissioners, <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Staff <br /> <br />Ms. Chaput asked interested Planning Commissioners to advise her if they are interested in <br />attending any of the upcoming workshops. <br />