My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-15-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 10-15-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - SEPTEMBER 5, 2001 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />CASE #0]-15 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. Flood Plain Ordinance. Codify as Dart of <br />Zoninl! Code - Public Hearinl! . <br /> <br />Chair Baker opened the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Staff reviewed their report dated August 28, 2001 and recommended approval for the <br />reasons contained therein. <br /> <br />Chair Baker asked if Rice Creek Watershed had the opportunity to review this change. <br />Mr. Cronin replied this was first adopted in 1991 and the only thing that would change <br />was the numbering system. The request was that if this was approved, they would figure <br />out exactly where in the Zoning Code this would be codified and they would have this <br />information for the Council meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Baker closed the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand moved, seconded by Commissioner Erickson, to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case #01-15, City of Arden Hills, Flood Plain Ordinance, Codify as <br />part of zoning code, for the following reasons and the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That prior to final adoption by the City Council the proper location of this <br />amendment in the Zoning Ordinance is determined by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, September 24,2001, regular meeting of the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />CASE #01-23 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - Sil!n Ordinance (First Read) <br /> <br />Staff reviewed their report dated August 28, 200 I and recommended setting this on for a <br />public hearing on the amendment for the reasons contained therein. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand asked when the signage process had been started. Mr. Cronin stated <br />it was started in mid-June and while they realized it was during the summer months that <br />might have been the reason for the low interest in this issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch asked where the hardship clause was in this new Ordinance. <br />Mr. Cronin replied for a sign there was almost never a hardship, it was usually economic. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch asked for clarification regarding the wording for the Section <br />X - Sign Adjustments. Mr. Cronin suggested wording it as Sign Ordinance Adjustments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand asked why they did not want to call it a variance. Mr. Cronin replied <br />they would have to deal with the hardship issue then. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand stated this seemed to be very discretionary. He asked what did <br />Mounds View use as far as language. Mr. Parrish replied he could not remember what <br />they called it, but it was a variance issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.