My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-12-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 09-12-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:46 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN DISCUSSION <br />SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 <br />5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, mayor Dennis Probst called to order the special <br />City Council meeting at 5:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Dennis Probst, Council Members David Grant, Gregg Larson, Lois <br />Rem, City Administrator Joseph Lynch, City Accountant Terry Post, Parks <br />& Recreation Director and Acting Public Works Director Torn Moore, <br />Greg Brown from BRW. <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />Council member Aplikowski. <br /> <br />PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN DISCUSSION <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council first discussed the map that was presented by Greg Brown ofBRW, identifying <br />four different types of streets: commercial collector, residential collector, local and <br />special cases. Council agreed with the designations of the different street types. Council <br />requested that the width designations be taken off. <br /> <br />Council member Grant left at 5:43 p.m. and returned at 5:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Council then began discussion about definition of the types of streets. As indicated on the <br />map, the commercial collectors were designated as 32 feet, the residential collectors had <br />no specific width designation, the local streets had 28 foot minimum width designation, <br />and the special case streets had no width designation. Lynch presented information he <br />had received from the interim City Planner Michael Cronin talking about the <br />improvement project being a planning process and perhaps looking at the designation of <br />the streets in a slightly different fashion. Cronin suggested that the street types be nan1ed <br />and defined according to their function for planning purposes rather than transportation <br />purposes. <br /> <br />A commercial road would provide access to the residents and institutions on that street <br />and provide a route tlrrough the neighborhood for residents of other streets as well as a <br />route on the boundary or through the neighborhood for residents of other neighborhoods <br />including those without an origin or destination along that street or in the neighborhood. <br />Most users have neither an origin or destination on that type of street. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A neighborhood street provides access to the residents on that street and provides a route <br />through the neighborhood for residents of other streets. Many users have neither an origin <br />or destination on that street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.