My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-12-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 09-12-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:46 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL PMP DISCUSSION - SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />A residential street provides access to the residents on that street. Almost all trips have <br />either an origin or destination on that street. <br /> <br />The Council agreed on the definitions with the community collector street taking the <br />place of the commercial collector, the neighborhood street taking the place of the <br />residential collector, the residential street taking the place oflocal designated streets, and <br />special case roads remaining as indicated. <br /> <br />The Council then began to discuss how to determine establishment of widths of each of <br />the newly described streets. Former commercial collector streets had been identified as <br />32 foot streets, and Council agreed that because this was a street that would contain the <br />most traffic and have the highest ADTs they were satisfied that it should have a minimum <br />32 foot width designation. <br /> <br />The former local street had a 28 foot width indicated and the Council was comfortable <br />that the new residential designated streets should continue to have a 28 foot width <br />indication, but that existing street width is a consideration for either expansion or <br />reduction. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The neighborhood street, formerly the residential collector street, was of a type which <br />would serve a function in between the community collector and residential street and <br />there was much discussion ahout whether it should contain a range of widths 28-32 feet, <br />should contain a maximum width no greater than 32 feet, or should indicate a <br />recommended width such as 32 feet. The Council did not come to consensus on this and <br />in presentalion of the Pavement Management Plan, the Council will need to vote on the <br />width designation for neighborhood streets. <br /> <br />The special case streets were indicated to be everything from cul-de-sacs to alleys to <br />short segments of roads containing less than a half dozen homes. The Council did agree <br />that the width of the street is measured from the inside curb to the inside curb, or face to <br />face, which contains the curb gutter section. <br /> <br />The Council then discussed curb and gutter options. There was agreement that concrete <br />edge strips would not be an option on community, neighborhood, and residential streets. <br />It would only be considered in special cases. The Council also agreed that concrete curb <br />and gutter will be specified without specific types being mentioned for each of the four <br />designated streets. The Council agreed that if putting in curb and gutter for the first time <br />the streets would have to be reconstructed. If an option is available for a project without <br />curb and gutter, overlay should be considered. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Council then went on to discuss the type of street. The goal of the Council is to make <br />sure that road restrictions can be removed from all ofthe streets throughout Arden Hills. <br />Greg Brown talked about the design standards that most streets would be designed and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.