Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10/12/01 FRI 10:06 FAX 612 624 7351 <br /> <br />MK l'SLS <br /> <br />Dat~: <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />October 12, 2001 <br /> <br />Arden Hills City council <br /> <br />Lois Rem <br /> <br />City cf Arden Hills Code of Ordinances <br /> <br />Here is a list of questions and comments based on my reading <br />the Code. Please note that I have not listed any of the numerous <br />. errors in punctuation and grammar. <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Chapter 1 <br />Page <br />1-14 120.03, Subd.l,2: Why state penalties here-- these are <br />statutory misdemeanor and petty penalties. <br /> <br />chapter <br />2-3 <br /> <br />2-5 <br />2-11 <br />2-12 <br /> <br />Chapter <br />3-7 <br /> <br />3-18 <br />3-56 <br /> <br />3-63 <br />3-76 <br />3-98 <br /> <br />3-103 <br />3-106 <br /> <br />3-114 <br />3-118 <br /> <br />3-122 <br />3-132 <br /> <br />2 <br />Shouldnt1:;. this include uconfirmation'" that vote was "'not* <br />received in person at precinet? <br />subd.2: lJote nwhether or not a quorum is present" <br />Subd.2: subd.3 & 4 appear to be subsections of this subd. <br />Subd.4: See the note following this. Are other Re~olution$ <br />similarly inserted into this code? Thi~ is the only one so <br />noted: I know there are others. <br /> <br />3 <br />310.01: J'inal line should ~tate, "a~ found in the fee <br />re~olution appendix" (cf 310.03) <br />9. References to subpart 5 seem contradictory. <br />A.l: Zoning distriet. Something seems to be missing(sense <br />between paragraph A and this section 1.) <br />c, Line 3: "interested parties has had, within five..." <br />7: Should be "or" instead of "and"? <br />Subd 2: Why,include fine amounts instead of referring to fee <br />appendix or state statute? <br />F.5: Lin~ end should be "or" instead ot "and." <br />R. "Five-Year project Plan" refers to... (unless diagram is <br />included in eode). <br />RR. "Two'-Year projeet Plan" refers to... (see 3-106). <br />E,F: Do both of these paragraphs follow from (D): The city <br />may requ.lre a copy of... "? Otherwise they make nO sense. If <br />they follow from D, they should be subordinate to it. <br />Subd.2: Insert "or" ["No person may excavate .Q.!: obstruct..."] <br />Subd.~: Director-- is this term defined? Do we want to use <br />it here ~nd elsewhere? <br /> <br />Chapter 7 <br />7-2 700.04: Does this include current changes re buoys on Lake <br />Johanna? <br />7-17 Subd. 7: Sentence "... mailing thereof. The notices ..." <br /> <br />10/12/01 - l <br /> <br />t,t] 002 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />