Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />10/12/01 FRI 10:06 FAX 612 624 7351 <br /> <br />llN USLS <br /> <br />~003 <br /> <br />7-24 <br />7-29 <br />7-32 <br /> <br />Chapter <br />9-6 <br />9-7 <br /> <br />9-8 <br /> <br />Chapter <br />10-2 <br />10-14 <br /> <br />10-23 <br />10-25 <br /> <br />10-26 <br />10-35 <br /> <br />10-39 <br /> <br />10-42 <br />10-44 <br />10-47 <br />10-55 <br /> <br />10-57 <br />10-58 <br />10-59 <br /> <br />10-61 <br /> <br />chapter <br />11-5 <br />11-6 <br /> <br />11-7 <br /> <br />11-17 <br /> <br />11-28 <br />11-32 <br /> <br />11- 60 <br /> <br />10/12/01 <br /> <br />720.02, Subd.l,2,5,8: Redundant definitions. <br />Subd6; Instead of "in accordance," should be "unless"? <br />Subd2,A: "in custody" should be "with custody." <br /> <br />9 <br />900.05 Subd.1: Why list these uses explicitly? <br />900.07 (all subds): Should prohibited districts also include <br />NB and CC? (Why not state as "permitted only in"?) <br />900.08: Why are business licenses in this chapter? (just <br />curious) <br /> <br />10 <br />Subd.3: Do~ble reference to city administrator. <br />B,B.1: Public works director again-- should be "other city <br />official"'? <br />B.2: 12: layers; soil~ *not* deemed suitable? <br />C. Why "The Council has noted that"? <br />Subd.2, line 2: Not two sentences (wear and tea::, the City <br />shall) . <br />Subd.6: The owner or occupant <br />Subd.3: Isn't there more "codel1 text for this section (sump <br />pumps) ? <br />B, line 3: Should be 2 sentences "... respectively located. <br />Charges " <br />See note on 10-23 above. <br />Subd.1, line 2: local governments <br />Subd.l: Why is this pa::agraph here? <br />C.: "for a _-acre...1f <br />Subd3: Is this current practice? <br />H. Add zoning NB, ee. <br />Subd.4: Again, add zoning NB, ce. <br />A~ "frequency specified in this .code"-- where is this <br />information? <br />Subd.ll: Annual certification. This applies to water billing <br />and should be under that division. <br /> <br />11 <br />Subd.9: refer to Chapter 2, 220.03, p.2-12 <br />Subd.13: incorporate changes in designations per current PMP; <br />define "alley." <br />F: Is this.our actual working definition? (See also p.11-25 <br />which seems to include right-of-way and p.11-40, Subd.2A.) <br />Subd.2 A: Rfirst regular meeting" is in practice "second <br />regular "eeting." <br />subd.9: Should this be "alleys shall not be permitted"? <br />Subd.5: "Council may wish to discuss" is not appropriate code <br />language. <br />Subd.1: 2nd sentence needs fixing ("if a registered land <br />survey is specified ... if a registe::ed land survey is <br />submitted.. . ") <br /> <br />- 2 <br />