Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\\cwer. L. Feter'~2!1 <br />Icrome I: filic' <br />DCOl1fei \\il ;:-I-am <br />Glenn A REI'2nl<'1'" <br />johll [\-1ichae(Mii:er <br />.\'liclICiel T Oberle <br />Steven H Bruns~ <br />Paui \V Fahning <br />Esther E. 1\1cGinnis <br />Jeffrey J. Cohell <br /> <br />T)"TEDC:;(~)~ 1 <br />J L.. 1",--=,,-",'{ <br /> <br />:JL ~ <br />-cJi'ii, :k <br />c:.t-'::: ~.- r..-"ir,\ <br />. 1~- <br /> <br />J !" <br />r t, <br /> <br /> <br />')0 East Firth Street <br />St. Paul, iVi\ ')";JOI-1107 <br />[6')11 Y!j-8()'j'j <br />16,1) 228-1700 facsimil_ <br /> <br />Direct Dial #(651) 290-6907 <br />jfilla@pfb-pa.com <br /> <br />September 27,2001 <br /> <br />Joe Lynch <br />City Administrator <br />City of Arden Hills <br />4364 West Round Lake Road <br />Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794 <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />>; r; 2e01 <br /> <br />CiT{ \.., <br /> <br />RE: Recodification <br />Our File No.: 10450/990003 <br /> <br />Dear Joe: <br /> <br />I have reviewed Chapters 100 through 1160 of the proposed recodification. I offer the _ <br />following general comments: ., <br /> <br />1. Section 110.02. This section contains definitions for the code. There are other <br />sections which also contain definitions (330.02, Subd. 1, 330.03, Subd. 2, <br />340.02,350.02,360.03,500.01,620.04, Subd. 2, 81O.Gl, Subd. 4, and <br />1100.04). Some city codes incorporate all definitions into one section. <br /> <br />2. Section 110.01. Where there are conflicts between various sections, the more <br />restrictive provision usually applies. This type of wording can be added in this <br />section. <br /> <br />3. Section 210.03. Subd. 1. This section is overly restrictive. The Council should <br />retain the right to have regular council meetings on any day that the Council <br />deems appropriate as long as the notice requirements are satisfied. <br /> <br />4. Section 210.03, Subd. 3. This section includes reference to a specific statute. <br />Generally, I do not recommend specific references where they can be avoided <br />because statutes change and codes become outdated without the City being <br />specifically aware. In this particular case, M.S. 9471.705 has already been <br />amended. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />