Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />November 20, 2001 <br /> <br />RE: City of Arden Hills <br />Local Water Management Plan <br />SEH No. A-ARDENOIOI.OO SPWR <br /> <br />Joe Lynch <br />Administrator <br />City of Arden Hills <br />4364 West Round Lake Boulevard <br />Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112-5794 <br /> <br />Dear Joe: <br /> <br />Enclosed is an invoice (No.8] 825) for the period of September I through October 31, 200] in the <br />amount $4,821.21. To date, we have expended approximately 97,8% of the project budget. We <br />have endeavored stay within the contract budget, however, several items have resulted in additional <br />expenditures. Following is a short discussion and cost sununary of the overages: <br /> <br />1. We prepared and submitted an additional set for the City Council of the draft Local Storm <br />Water Management Plan. This resulted in 31 copies of the draft plan, while our contract <br />specified 15 copies. This overage is $480,00 for 16 copies. <br />2. We (Beth Peterson and myself) attended the City Council meeting with Rice Creek Watershed <br />District staff on July 16th. The overage for preparation and attendance was $740,00. <br />3. Mr. Ron Leaf, P.E. attended two City Council meetings that were not budgeted. This overage <br />for preparation and attendance was $1,250.00. <br /> <br />To date, total expenditures outside the project scope of work and contract amount is $2,470.00, <br /> <br />We are in receipt of two letters to date regarding the draft LSWMP, One is from Ramsey Soil and <br />Water Conservation District (October 18, 2001) and tbe second from Metropolitan Council <br />Environmental Services (November 5, 2001). It's interesting to note, RSWCD had extensive <br />substantive comments while MCES had none. As indicated in your letter of October 31, 2001, we <br />need to prepare a response to these letters and others fOT your review prior to the City Council <br />meeting in December. We anticipate receipt of a comment letter from Rice Watershed District on <br />or before the deadline of November 30, 2001, It is our intent to reply to external agency comments <br />with appropriate changes to the LSWMP. Sucb response to comment will be provided to you for <br />review and discussion. <br />