My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-08-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-08-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 25, 2002 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst expressed concern about reconsidering this because it had been previously <br />authorized and the staff had worked hard on this restructuring. He asked for further clarification <br />what Councilmember's Aplikowski concerns were. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she was uncomfortable with the structure format, and it was <br />too top heavy, which would separate the City Administrator from the employees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked for a budgetary breakdown as to what these two Directors positions <br />would cost. She indicated she had not been convinced that the new structure would work. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem indicated that Mr. Moore has had his hands too full, and she believed both <br />of his positions were more than two part-time positions and should not be one full-time position. <br />She agreed ifthis new structure was accepted, the City would be too top heavy in management. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated if they were going to talk about specific positions, they should do <br />this in a closed session. He indicated this reorganization would provide an extra layer of <br />management, which was an expense to the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he believed the City Administrator had previously provided a cost <br />breakdown of what the expense for these new positions would be, and he believed the City had <br />been functioning as it should be. He stated the Council had previously approved this and he did <br />not believe they should reconsider it. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he still supported what had been decided last year and encouraged Council <br />to stay with their original decision. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated her biggest concern was that the City Administrator was <br />separating himself from the rest of the employees. She inquired as to why this was the best way <br />to proceed. Mr. Lynch replied a lot of discussion had previously gone into this proposal, and that <br />all of the staff had been consulted with. He indicated this was what staff had agreed to at that <br />time. He stated he would not isolate himself from the rest of staff. He indicated this was not his <br />management style. He stated the reason for the two positions was for a greater sense of "team" <br />and to have two people manage those two areas. He stated all employees would meet regularly <br />and would know what was going on. It would be up to staff to decide how to schedule the <br />workload. He stated this would create more of a sense of "team", rather than less. He stated he <br />was listening to the staff, and he did not believe it was fair to do eleventh hour reconsideration. <br />He stated his original intent was organization by function and management by people who were <br />available, including him, and to proceed with the dedication of long-range plans for the City. He <br />noted this would undo work that had taken place to date, including union and staff work. He <br />indicated staff had made a commitment to the structure and this would undo that commitment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated they were not undoing anything at this time. She indicated <br />they had in the past brought in a person to do economic development and things did not get done. <br />She stated she wanted to take another look at this. She indicated this was not the only way to do <br />the restructuring. She stated it would have been nice if Council had the opportunity to talk about <br />this and had heard from staff. She staled if the rest of the Council felt the reorganizalion was the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.