My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-08-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-08-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 25, 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />~.~ <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />way to go, she would go along with it. She indicated she still believed the City Administrator <br />would be separated from the rest of the staff. She stated she had not come to this decision easily. <br />She stated this was not the way she wanted lhe City to look. Councilmember Aplikowski statcd <br />her issue was with the job descriptions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated they needed to have morc discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated if this was an issue about the job descriptions, why didn't Council <br />discuss the job descriptions, and not reconsider the previously approved structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated she believed Council should hear from more of the staff, other than <br />the City Administrator, as to what they wanted the City structure to be. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion <br />to extend the Arden Hills City Council meeting to 10:30 p.m. Motion carried <br />unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated it was the Council's responsibility to lead the City, and they had the <br />responsibility to support the City Administrator when they had instructed him to do something. <br />He expressed frustration that the Council was unable to reach a decision and stick with it. He <br />stated he did not see the logic for backtracking. He indicated he not believe any employer would <br />consult the entire staff as to how management should be structured. . <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant recommended they take this issue to a worksession. Mayor Probst asked <br />for direction as to what Council was looking for in order to have a worksession discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he wanted to see other alternatives to restructuring. He suggested <br />the combining of Parks with Public Works was a good idea. He stated he was not in favor of a <br />tall and narrow structure; but a tall and wide structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she wanted to see a budget analysis. She stated these <br />positions had not been posted yet, and she did not feel that fifteen days would make much of a <br />difference. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he thought it was unfair to the Administrator to ask him to come <br />up with other alternatives, when this was the alternative they had agreed to. He stated if the City <br />Administrator did not agree with an alternative, it would be counterproductive. He stated they <br />nceded the City Administrator's support of a structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski staled she had not seen any other alternatives and she wanted other <br />ideas to be presented. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem also requested a budget breakdown. She stated with respect to the job . <br />descriptions; she was not convinced that the structure they had was working. She stated team <br />building needed to get done by the staff. She asked why they needed two new people, and what <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.