Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 26, 2001 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />the applicants have had an opportunity to develop their sites with access to Amble <br />Road or Windcrest Court in the past. <br /> <br />Ms, Diane Gibson,1297 Windcrest Court, stated she had nothing to add, She noted <br />she shared all the concerns about safety and flooding, She added it was her <br />understanding that both residents had options to have an access. <br /> <br />Ms, Mirabella stated Hamline Avenue has really become a war zone to try to get off <br />onto. She noted none of the streets line up so there is no logical place to put in a stop <br />light. She added the cars rev up for the ramp so the speeding there is atrocious, She <br />stated it is way below the standard for a county road, <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he certainly could not support the concept plan as <br />proposed given the City Engineer's comments and the comments from the Fire <br />Department. He noted that at the same time, this area is landlocked. He added that it <br />was part of the city that could be developed although perhaps not to the intensity <br />shown here, He stated this configuration is the wrong one. He noted he was not sure <br />there is a right one, He noted the applicants should be given the opportunity to review <br />it again. He added if the applicants wish to go forward, it would be worthwhile to <br />look at it. He stated he lived next to an empty lot for five years and he loved it. He <br />noted the lot was eventually developed and it was sad, He added it was the owner's <br />right to develop that property. He stated it was not totally fair to the current property <br />owners to say they would not develop the land because the neighbors like the open <br />space there, <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated landowners do have certain rights. She noted she <br />could not support this level of development. She added she was supportive of a <br />modified plan with a cul-de-sac at the end. She stated she did not think it was a <br />reasonable response to say the owners had a chance for an access 20 years ago and <br />that was their only chance, She notes she could understand concerns about the loss <br />of open space, She added her neighbor built a fence that destroyed her view, She <br />stated she would like to say go back to the drawing board, She noted she was not <br />against doing something, but this is too much. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he lived in an area with a meadow in the back. He noted <br />he could relate to some ofthe comments, but Councilmember Larson expressed it <br />well, He added this is a large parcel. He stated if they dropped the density they could <br />shorten the road and might reduce the costs, He noted he was not prepared to move <br />on this concept plan, He added he would be open to some type ofrevision, He stated <br />he shared Councilmember Aplikowski's concerns about the road, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he served on the Planning Commission prior to being on the <br />Council. He noted it was his recollection that there were options for access. He <br />added that for reasons not recalled the owners chose not to pursue them, He stated <br />