CCP 01-14-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 26, 2001 14 that in hindsight, the city should have taken action here and did a paper street for access to these points, He noted there has been a fairly steadfast attempt to avoid flag lots, He added they have attempted to avoid private streets, He stated that in the instances private streets have been approved they have been for one or two properties only, He noted he had significant concerns about the five lots, their utilities, and the service of emergency vehicles, He added this neighborhood does have water problems, He stated the City has had to make a number of corrections, He noted that too much is trying to happen here. He added he would not support creating this number of properties on a private street. He stated that in addition to street corrections, there would also be two driveways. He noted those driveways would need to come off the street and enforce the idea that it needs to be public, Councilmember Rem stated her biggest concern was that as presented the maximum number oflots, She noted there is going to have to be a real street there, She added she really had misgivings about the street going onto Hamline Avenue. Councilmember Aplikowski stated there are already traffic problems there, She noted adding five homes would not increase the traffic significantly, She added the traffic was not a big issue here, but the size of the road was an issue, Councilmember Grant asked when the applicants could come back with a revised plan, He questioned whether it would be better to table the matter and let them come back, Mr. Parish stated the zoning ordinance indicates that the applicant can come back in six months, He noted he would suggest a new application. Mayor Probst stated ifthe plan changed substantially the applicants could come in tomorrow with new fee. He asked about the applicant withdrawing the application, Mr. Parrish responded if they withdrew the application, anything new would be a new application. Councilmember Aplikowski asked the applicants why they wanted to do this, Mr. Goserud responded it is a large piece of property to maintain, He stated they were looking for a smaller property in the future for retirement. He noted they would be selling the property. He added they feel it is a parcel that can be divided. Councilmember Aplikowski asked if the applicant's desire was strong enough to come back with another plan, Mr, Goserud responded in the affirmative, Mayor Probst stated his strong desire was to see a modified proposal go back through the planning process and not straight to the Council. . . .