My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-28-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 26,2001 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />designation for the Beacon Property from neighborhood business to high density <br />residential is denied. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Counci1member Grant asked Mr. Parrish to review the possible uses for this property. <br />Mr. Parrish responded the primary uses would be retail, banks, housing provision as long <br />as done in conjunction with retail. He stated it is more of a commercial designation. He <br />noted the setback requirements are less. He added there are provisions for buffering. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if a video store would qualify. Mr. Parrish responded in the <br />affirmative. He read the permitted uses. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion to <br />adopt a resolution incorporating the elements read by the City Attorney. The <br />motion carried (3-2 Aplikowski and Grant). <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated there is still an application for rezoning and PUD approval. He noted the <br />Council should take action on those as well. He added one legal reason for denial of a <br />rezoning is the zoning requested is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion to <br />deny request for rezoning since it is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan and to deny the Master Plan PUD and Final Plan PUD/Site Plan requests <br />since they are inconsistent with the current zoning. The motion carried (4-1). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. Case #01-27, Tom and Kathy Goserud/Roger Aiken, 4320 and 4360 Hamlinee <br />Avenue, Preliminary Plat and Variance <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish explained the request before the Council was for a preliminary plat and a <br />variance to facilitate platting seven lots from two existing lots. He stated the two <br />existing lots would be retained with existing single-family residences. He noted the <br />remainder lots would be available for singe-family residential development. He added <br />the first variance that is being requested is to allow for the use of a private access. He <br />stated the second variance for lots 2 through 6 is for lot depth variances. He noted the <br />range in type that is being requested. He added there have been past applications on <br />these properties. He stated most recently there was a plan for a PUD for 12 detached <br />townhomes. He noted unresolved issues caused the application to be withdrawn. He <br />added that with the platting in the surrounding area on the south of MY. Goserud's <br />property with Karth Lake Second Addition and Karth Lake South there was also <br />consideration given to these properties in terms of access or potential access. He <br />reviewed the performance criteria contained in the staff report. He stated there are <br />some lot depth variances that are being requested. He noted access is the fundamental <br />issue. He added the subdivision ordinance requires a public dedicated street. He <br />stated the fire inspector indicated 20 feet of bituminous would be the minimum e <br />requirement for fire access. He noted the City Engineer indicated that this type of <br />development would be more appropriately served by a public road. He added that as a <br />result the Planning Commission did recommend denial with regard to private access. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.