My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-11-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 02-11-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:03 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />EN HILLS <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: February 7, 2002 <br /> <br />TO: Joe Lynch, City Administrator <br />FROM: Aaron Parrish, City Planner fif <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Digital Camera <br /> <br />As you are aware, the City's existing digital camera is only compatible with computers that run <br />on the Windows 95 or 98 operating system, Since we are now fully networked, we do not utilize <br />this operating system. In the past, the digital camera has been used by the Building Official and <br />Inspector to document code enforcement violations, by the Park and Recreation staff to <br />photograph various programming activities to be included in brochures etc. . . , by Public Works <br />staff to document sewer and water breaks, and by the City Planner for Planning Cases and <br />special projects. <br /> <br />After some checking and comparative shopping, I have identified the Canon PowerShot G2 as a <br />digital camera that would meet our needs. This camera will take high quality pictures, has a lot <br />of memory, uses a rechargeable battery, is compatible with our current computers, and comes <br />with excellent photo editing software. Most importantly, the camera features a 3.6X zoom lens <br />necessary for documenting code enforcement violations. <br /> <br />The camera costs approximately $750 to $900 depending on the payment method used to <br />purchase the product. This expense was not included in the 2002 capital budget. However, we <br />did not fully expend the revenues allocated to purchase laser printers. More specifically, $7500 <br />was allocated for the purchase of 3 three replacement laser printers, and only $5469 was spent. <br />This represents a difference of $2031. In short, this expense would not have any adverse <br />budgetary impacts. Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.