My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-11-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 02-11-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:03 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES <br />JANUARY 22, 2002 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />report to make a determination on the tower's safeness. He indicated American Tower <br />does manage 10,000 towers around the country. The cost estimate could be reduced if <br />the next evaluator can use the existing geotechnical report, The American Tower <br />proposed report by American Tower would include ultrasonic testing which has not been <br />done thus far and would give the condition of the existing tower, Scherbel said we have <br />received several reports since 1997 indicating the tower is not up to code but no report as <br />to what to do to fix it. Probst said he suggests we make it clear to Vaughn that we expect <br />reimbursement. Scherhel said his main concern is the tower and public safety and that <br />Vaughn has compounded the problem by adding additional antennas. Parrish noted <br />Vaughn currently has 25 antennas but his SUP allows only 15 antennas. Aplikowsi said <br />we should spend the money up front and have an evaluation and find out if it is safe as is. <br />If it's safe as is then we are done with the issue. If it is unsafe we find out what he needs <br />to do to make it safe and make it happen. We should request him to pay for the report <br />which would include evaluation ofthe previous report and evaluation of the tower. After <br />the second report is completed we will continue to move forward to close this issue. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Finance Department <br />2002 Budget - Recreation Programming ~ Three options were presented to amend the <br />adopted 2002 Recreation budget. Option A would involve a 10% price increase and <br />75/25 Charitable Gambling Fund split. Option B would utilize a portion of the General <br />Fund surplus and involve creating the newsletter in-house. Option C would involve an <br />increase in price by 5% and 65/35 Charitable Gambling Fund split and a newsletter <br />reduction from three issues to two issues. <br /> <br />Council agreed a 70/30 Charitable Gambling split, a 5% price increase, and a reduction in <br />the number of newsletter issues. This item was moved to the Consent Calendar for <br />formal action. <br /> <br />2002 Fee Schedule Review - The 2002 Fee Schedule had been adopted without Larson's <br />changes. Larson asked another column be added to reflect the previous year's changes <br />and current year's so it is easily visible what price has changed. Item was moved to the <br />Consent Calendar with Larson's changes noted. <br /> <br />Public Works Department <br />Water Restriction and Water Usage Ordinance - The previously requested changes <br />have been made. Probst suggested two more changes (language change from "City <br />Council may override" rather than" City Council has a right to") ($20.00 a day fine for <br />residents versus $25.00) and then item will be moved to Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Administration Department <br />City Hall Use Policy and Fees - Lynch noted he has adjusted the fees as Council has <br />requested. Grant noted he is surprised we are going ahead with renting the rooms after <br />the other cities have advised us against doing so. Lynch noted most the other cities used <br />a Community Center and not their City Hall. Rem indicated we can try it for a year and <br />ifit doesn't work we can stop it. Probst noted he does not want to waive damage deposit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.