Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />APRIL 8, 2002 <br /> <br />f.;-";:_.___i~,") /7\. r':.:; <br />U~\.~,"r""~~ i <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Mr. Murnane responded that every property they had dealt with had not gone thru an orderly <br />transfer process; somc points and steps had been skipped; and, some not in the sequential order <br />as indicated in any transfcr chronology. <br /> <br />Grant also asked for an explanation regarding the narrowmg of roads and the lack of <br />infrastructure for Stormwatcr system. <br /> <br />Mr. Applebaunl rcsponded that the storm watcr ponding and piping systcm is not neccssarily <br />applicable evcrywhere. Thcy try to deal with Stormwatcr as a resource and not as a waste <br />product, and in some locations they havc bccn able to construct curbing that assists in protecting <br />the road-bed. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant asked if at thc Arbor Lakes project, which projects came first - the large <br />scale retail format or the smaller retails bchind. <br /> <br />The group responded that this was fairly typical, but at Arbor Lakes, they had previously <br />dcsigned the smaller scalc rctail as a part of the largc scale format. <br /> <br />City Council Member Larson askcd if large scale retail use is not part of the development of <br />TCAPP, is OPUS still interested in this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Murnane said they would still look at the TCAAP project, and bring in thcir main <br />dcvclopment type, which is officc and commercial developmcnt. He also said thcy would not <br />"kid thcmselves" as to what the City wanted. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson asked, if the developmcnt IS primarily rcsidential, IS succcss still <br />possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Ncwman rcsponded by saying he believed that redevelopment can be supportcd primmily by <br />residential developmcnt. <br /> <br />Council Membcr Rcm asked about the time frame and what is rcalistic. <br /> <br />Thc group responded that a Woodbury project required a 24-month delay, but thcy anticipate <br />preliminary plat approval by August/September 2002, and are paticnt rcgarding this [TCAAP] <br />project as well. <br /> <br />Council Membcr Larson asked how they would get around a landlord that wants to release thc <br />property with a clean-up Icvcl only to industrial standards. <br /> <br />The group responded that therc are funds available [at the Congressional level] to assist in <br />cleaning up a site to a higher standard, and they could look to Senator Dayton for assistance. Mr. <br />Rockenstcin pointed out that there is a gap in land value; the Amry cannot market thc propcrty as <br />commcrcial/residential standards, which would ultimately impact the valued that is detcrmincd <br />for the property. <br />