My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-17-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 06-17-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:15 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:04:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to Mayor and Council <br />Cub Concept PUD <br />June 10,2002 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the side elevations to provide additional architectural interest. Perspective drawings will be <br />provided at the meeting. <br /> <br />8. Sign age: This particular property is located in the Sign District 5, or the Lexington South of <br />96 District. Based on our signage regulations, properties are allowed 80 square feet for wall <br />signage, and 100 square feet for a freestanding sign. Freestanding signs in this sign district <br />are required to be monument style signs. Sillce this is a PUD, additional signage may be <br />granted. The applicant is requesting the following: <br /> <br />Si!!llage Tvpe <br />Wall Signage <br />Wall Signage <br />Wall Signage <br /> <br />Location <br />Front of Building <br />North Side of Building <br />South Side of Building <br /> <br />Square Footage <br />900 <br />210 <br />330 <br />Subtotal: 1,440 <br /> <br />Monument Sign <br /> <br />Northeast Corner of Property <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />Total Signage: 1,570 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Given the size of the retail operation and since the building has two street fronts, staff would <br />agree that additional building signage is appropriate. However, the signage above does <br />appear to be excessive relative to our signage requirements. Staff would suggest the <br />applicant evaluate areas where signage can be reduced and/or elimillated in conjunction with <br />the PUD submittals: <br /> <br />9. Lighting <br /> <br />In addition to accent lighting on the building, the applicant is proposing approximately 8-10 <br />25 foot high recessed shoebox style lights for the site. High pressure sodium (amber color <br />light) bulbs would be used. <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />Provide comments relative to the applicant's Concept Planned Unit Development <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />1. Location map <br />2_ Letter from applicant <br />3. Site plan and building elevation <br />4. 05-31-02 Memo from City Engineer <br />5. Planning Commission Meeting Millute Excerpt <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.