Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />August 16,2002 <br />Budget discussion at August 19,2002 Worksession <br /> <br />The reduction in the salaries and benefits that are levy supported in the 2003 proposed budget <br />(compared to the 2002 budget) arises primarily from a more aggressive alIocation of <br />administrative salaries into TeAAP Fund No. 229 and a reduction in planned O&M resources <br />from Park Maintenance into Sanitary Sewer Fund No. 602 and Surface Water Management Fund <br />No. 604. <br /> <br />It should also be noted that the recent LRA salary recommendations from an implementation <br />standpoint have not been reflected in the baseline. <br /> <br />Other/On-~oin~ Bud~et Policy Issues <br />1. Level of funding for the Day in the Park activity. <br />2. Implementation costs of the LRA salary study. <br />3. Recreation operations subsidy source. <br />4. Input still required for five-year parks CIP. <br />5. Declining level of building permit revenues. <br /> <br />Staff intends to provide a total City "first cut" budget at the August 26, 2002, regular City <br />Council meeting. The City has still not received the 2003 levy limit from the Minnesota <br />Department of Revenue as of the date of this memorandum. <br />