My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-19-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 08-19-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:20 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />TCAAP Community Dialogue: Transportation Focus <br />Natural Resources and Transportation Small Group Discussions <br />July 25, 2002 <br />7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Prepared by the Design Center for American Urban Landscape <br /> <br />Transportation Discussion <br /> <br />Question #1. With respect to transportation, what are your concerns about development <br />of the southwest crescent of TCMP? <br /> <br />Local Concerns: <br />. Impact on arterials to South - Hamline Ave in particular <br />· Hwy 96ffH 10 intersection need improvement - grade separation good idea <br />. Within the development - jobslbousing balance important, connectivity <br />important, multiple modes of transportation important, sidewalks are important <br />· Road can be a barrier in getting from home to work, design good crossings <br />· Site isolated by large roads, non-auto connections adjacent neighborhoods, cities <br />is a challenge <br /> <br />Subregional/Community Concerns: <br />· Traffic mix -- potentially more trucks, development will put more trips on <br />existing roads; need good traffic management strategies, e.g. signalization <br />· Development will increase congestion, need to mitigate impacts <br />. Development will be a job magnet - <br />· Existing roads may be able to handle more volume than we think <br />· Keep neighborhood development in mind - plan for all <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Regional Concerns: <br />. 35W and Hwy 10 may nced improvements to hand addition traffic <br />. Rail infrastructure asset maximize - freight, passenger, trails are all possibilities <br />. Keep regional traffic on regional network <br />. Connect area to regional transportation systems: bus, rail, etc. <br /> <br />Question #2. What transportation alternatives do you envision as part of the <br />redevelopment of the southwest crescent of TCAAP? <br />· Locate 2 primary transit centers - circulators for new development and adjacent <br />community - include bike racks and other amenities for commuters (2 tables <br />suggested) <br />. Trails need to connect stores, recreation - make it easy for people to walk or bike <br />rather than using the car <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.