Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HlLLS <br /> <br />TCAAP Community Dialogue: Transportation Focus <br />Natural Resources and Transportation Small Group Discussions <br />July 25, 2002 <br />7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Prepared by !he Design Center for American Urban Landscape <br /> <br />. Rail is an option - consider multiple uses of rail right-of-way, e.g. pedestrians in day <br />time or trails for bikes <br />· Need trail under/over passes to get across major highways bordering site <br />· Use every transportation option to accommodate mixed use intense development <br /> <br />Question #3 What land use and development strategies should be considered to support <br />these transportation alternatives for the southwest crescent? <br />· Live and work close together <br />. TOD approach - community uses in center, ring center with open space <br />· Engineering needs for grade separation might cause land use problems/constraints <br />· Land use and development for rail/freight activity <br />· Mix of uses within development <br />· Put a transportation plan in place before development begins <br />· Density enough to support transit <br />· Land use/transportation connected; needed to look at both simultaneously <br />. Keep in mind - you're planning a small community, there should be a mix of land <br />uses, there are many things to consider <br />. Intense mixed-use areas <br />. TH 10 - remove deck <br />· Grade separation at Hwy 96 and over rail is needed to make crossing easy for <br />bicyclists and pedestrians <br />. Trails can connect to Long Lake Park, extend park system and access <br />· Put commercial development along TH 10 to buffer residential areas from sound, that <br />way we can avoid sound barriers. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />