My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-16-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 09-16-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:25 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Land Use and Transportation <br />Analytical Sequence <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Baseline assumptions for land use and transportation modeling analyses <br /> . Roadways: existing plus policy commitments to 2025 - no added lanes on 35W, include streets to <br /> serve new development in (TCAAP) with parkway between CRd I & J, Club West Service Rd to Hwy <br /> 65, Twin Lakes Parkway <br /> . Transit existing (includes Sector 1 & 2 changes) plus NE Diagonal Transitway plus service assump- <br /> tions for extensions/new routes to serve transit-oriented development centers in Scenario 2.5a <br /> . Land Use: (re)development assigned to 2020 opportunity areas as Identified by cities; future land use <br /> in comprehensive guide plan basis for development type assignment <br /> Scenario 1.5 - conventional land use pattern, includes (re)development project knowns <br /> Scenario 2.5 - Coalition land use patterns include known (re)development projects <br /> . Household & Jobs Projections: net growth will, at a minimum, approximate the average of city compo <br /> plan and Met Council projections for 2020 <br /> I I <br />Scenario 1.5a (Conventional) Scenario 2.5a (Coalition Preferred) <br />. Unconstrained model run . Unconstrained model run <br />. Roadways: baseline . Roadways: baseline <br />. Transit baseline . Transit: baseline <br />. Land Use: low density, single use dominates . Land Use: compact, mixed-use develop- <br /> ment in locations suitable for TODs, more <br /> moderate-density housi ng types <br /> I I <br /> 1st Subarea Model Run Analysis <br /> . Compare land use 1.5a and 2.5a <br /> . Identify needs for highway and transit <br /> . Identify potential land useldevelopment modifications <br /> I <br /> Preparation for 2nd Subarea Model Run <br /> . Code proposed missing connections in existing arterial network and systems needs <br /> for highways <br /> . Code transit needs (will include route modifications or increased frequency) and <br /> additional transit service to accommodate land use modifications for 2.5c <br /> . Develop land use modifications for 2.5c <br /> I <br /> I I <br />Scenario 2.5b Scenario 2.5c <br />(add road network) (add road network and optimize transit) <br />. Constrained model run . Constrained model run <br />. Roadways: as modified . Roadways: as modified <br />. Transit baseline . Transit: as modified <br />. Land Use: revised 2.5a scenario . Land Use: revised 2,5a scenario <br /> I I <br /> I <br /> 2nd Subarea Model Run Analysis <br /> . Compare to unconstrained 2.5a run <br /> . Identify further opportunities that might be <br /> addressed in future runs <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.