Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Subarea Transportation Model Assumptions <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Three components of the transportation system were analyzed: regional <br />roadway network, minor arterial network in the subregion, and public tran- <br />sit in the subregion, i.e. bus. <br /> <br />Mn/DOT had expressed to the Coalition an interest in working coopera- <br />tively on long-range planning for regional facilities in the North I-35W corri- <br />dor. Thus, they were engaged as a study partner. The regional facilities ana- <br />lyzed in this part of the study included 1-694, I-35W, 1B 36, and 1B 10 from 1- <br />694 to I-35W. The analysis focused on three key issues: 1) freeway capacity <br />and travel demand; 2) operation problems beyond those identified in recent <br />studies; and 3) design and operational options for 1B 10. <br /> <br />The minor arterial roadway network is primarily under the jurisdiction <br />of either Anoka County or Ramsey County. The Coalition is concerned <br />about the future of this network because these roads have a multi-function <br />role in each community and directly impact local quality of life and eco- <br />nomic development opportunities. <br /> <br />In many cities, development patterns rely heavily on minor arterials to <br />accommodate all types of land uses. Residential neighborhoods depend <br />upon direct access to arterials with higher levels of service, thus relieving <br />local streets of trips headed to destinations outside the neighborhood. In <br />other instances, minor arterials are the" commercial street" for a suburban <br />downtown or neighborhood center. Arterials provide direct access to busi- <br />nesses, accommodate transit riders, and provide, in some cases, on-street <br />parking. <br /> <br />This study seeks to provide information about the impacts of municipal <br />land use decisions on minor arterial travel demand, which might then lead <br />to agreements between cities and counties on future development patterns <br />and minor arterial design speed, operational management, and mainte- <br />nance. <br /> <br />Transit service is the third area of analytical focus. A primary inquiry of <br />the study is to determine if changes in land use patterns have potential to <br />increase transit use and, thereby, justify investment in additional transit <br />service upgrades for Coalition cities. Currently, much of the Coalition lies <br />within the Met Council Area IV transit service market, which implies that <br />transit delivery focuses on park & ride facilities, circulator services, and <br />some local routes with higher frequency service during peak hours. <br /> <br />Transportation Assumptions <br />The first run of the subarea model was designed to compare the conven- <br />tional and Coalition growth scenarios. The transportation system was held <br />constant for both scenarios during the first run. The following assump- <br />tions were made: <br /> <br />13 <br />