Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regulatory Framework <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The MPCA is the governmental regulatory agency responsible for implementing <br />regulations controlling traffic noise in Minnesota. Minnesota State noise standards have <br />been established specifically for daytime and nighttime periods. For residential land uses <br />(identified as Noise Area Classification 1 or NAC-1), the Minnesota State standards for LIO <br />are 65 decibels for daytime and 55 decibels for nighttime; the standards for Lso are <br />60 decibels for daytime and 50 decibels for nighttime. For parkland with no overnight uses <br />(such as Cummings Park), NAC-l daytime standards apply to both daytime and nighttime <br />noise levels. <br /> <br />Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subd. 2a. states that municipal and county roads, except in the <br />cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, are exempt from state noise standards. All the roads <br />near the proposed project site are county or city roads (with the exception ofI-694) and are <br />therefore exempt from standards. State standards are included in this study for reference <br />only and are depicted in Table 22. <br /> <br />TABLE 22 <br />MINNESOTA STATE NOISE STANDARDS <br /> <br /> MPCA State Noise Standards <br />Land Use Code Day (7 a.m. -10 p.m.) dBA Night (10 p.m. -7 a.m.) dBA <br />Residential NAC-1 LIO of 65 L50 of 60 LIO of 55 L5oof50 <br />Commercial NAC-2 LIO of70 L50 of 65 LIO of 70 L5oof65 <br />Industrial NAC-3 LIO of 80 L5oof75 LIO of 80 L5oof75 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Noise Level Monitoring <br /> <br />Noise level monitoring is commonly performed during a noise study to document existing <br />noise levels at selected receptor locations. Existing monitored noise levels can be used as a <br />"baseline" against which future scenarios are compared. In addition, when studying future <br />noise levels projected with computcr models, monitored noise levels are compared to <br />modeled results for existing conditions to validate the computer modeling techniques and <br />results. <br /> <br />Existing noise levels were monitored at three sites (R2, R4 and R 7) in the project area on <br />July 9, 2002, Monitoring site locations were chosen to represent areas of outdoor human <br />activity, i.e., residential yards (Figure 16). Noise monitoring results are presented in <br />Table 23. Monitoring results are presented along with the results of computer modeling for <br />existing daytime noise conditions, The computer-modeled results are within . <br />o to 2 decibels of the monitored levels; therefore, the computer model can be considered to <br />be a valid predictor of future noise levels. <br /> <br />Guidant Campus Master Plan <br />Draft AUAR <br /> <br />-49- <br /> <br />September 2002 <br />