My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-30-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 09-30-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:05:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Park Receptor (R9) <br /> <br />Daytime and nighttime noise levels at R9 are predicted to increase by up to 2 decibels over <br />existing levels with the No-Build and Build Alternatives. Build noise levels are predicted <br />to be up to 1 decibel higher than No-Build noise levels at R9. State daytime noise <br />standards will not be exceeded at R9 for the No-Build or Build conditions. <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />As stated previously, it takes a doubling of traffic volumes to result in a perceptible <br />(3 dBA) increase in noise. The increase in Build peak hour traffic volumes over No-Build <br />volumes will not increase noise levels by perceptible amounts (less than 3 dBA) compared <br />to No-Build levels, Therefore, no noise mitigation is being considered in conjunction with <br />the proposed project. <br /> <br />25. SENSITIVE RESOURCES <br /> <br />EAW: <br />ARE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RESOURCES ON OR IN PROXIMITY TO THE <br />SITE? IF ANY ITEMS ARE ANSWERED YES, DESCRIBE THE RESOURCE AND <br />IDENTIFY ANY IMP ACTS ON THE RESOURCE DUE TO THE PROJECT. <br />DESCRIBE ANY MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO MINIMIZE OR AVOID ADVERSE <br />. IMPACTS. <br /> <br />A. ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, OR ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES? <br />--'L NO YES <br /> <br />AUAR: <br />For an AUAR, contact with the State Historic Preservation Office is required to determine <br />whether there are areas of potential impacts to these resources. If any exist, an <br />appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the issue in more <br />detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified. <br /> <br />On June 14, 2002, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted to <br />determine whether there were cultural resources within the AUAR study area that could be <br />potentially impacted by the proposed campus expansion. No archaeological or historic <br />sites were found in the SHPO datasets for the AUAR study area. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />PRIME OR UNIQUE FARMLANDS? --.2L NO <br /> <br />YES <br /> <br />AUAR: <br />The extent of conversion o( existing farmlands anticipated in the A UAR should be <br />described. If any farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should <br />be discussed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Guidant Campus Master PIau <br />Draft AUAR <br /> <br />- 52. <br /> <br />September 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.