Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />28. IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES <br /> <br />EAW: <br />WILL NEW OR EXPANDED UTILITIES, ROADS, OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE, OR <br />PUBLIC SERVICES BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE PROJECT? _ NO.x. YES <br /> <br />IF YES, DESCRIBE THE NEW OR ADDmONAL INFRASTRUCTURE/SERVICES <br />NEEDED. (ANY INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS A "CONNECTED ACTION" WITH <br />RESPECT TO THE PROJECT MUST BE ASSESSED IN THE EA W; SEE "EA W <br />GUIDELINES" FOR DETAILS.) <br /> <br />AUAR: <br />This item should first of all summarize information on physical infrastructure presented <br />under other items (such as 6, 19, and 22). Other major infrastructure of public services <br />not covered under other items should be discussed as well - this includes major social <br />services such as schools, police, fire, etc. <br /> <br />As noted above and in the "EA W Guidelines, " the RGU must be careful to include project- <br />associated infrastructure as an explicit part of the A UAR review if it is to be exempt from <br />project-specific review in the future. <br /> <br />As previously detailed in Items 6, 13 and 18, existing public water and sanitary sewer <br />services can accommodate the additional needs of the proposed campus. Lateral line <br />extensions from the existing water and sanitary sewer mains in Fernwood Avenue will be <br />required for the new buildings. Storm water treatment and conveyance infrastructure will <br />be necessary as described in Item 17. <br /> <br />Item 6 describes roadway improvements planned for the Guidant campus. <br /> <br />Increased fire and police protection will need to be provided to the area with the proposed <br />expansion. However, the need for these services has been anticipated by the city and will <br />be provided, as required, as the site develops. As there is no residential land use associated <br />with the planned site development, no impacts to the local school system will result. <br /> <br />29. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS <br /> <br />EAW; <br />MINNESOTA RULE PART 4410.1700, SUBPART 7, ITEM B REQUIRES THAT THE <br />RGU CONSIDER THE "CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF RELATED OR <br />ANTICIPATED FUTURE PROJECTS" WHEN DETERMINING TIlE NEED FOR AN <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. IDENTIFY ANY PAST, PRESENT OR <br />REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE PROJECTS THA T MAY INTERACT WITH <br />THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THIS EA W IN SUCH A WAY AS TO CAUSE <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS. DESCRIBE THE NATURE OF THE CUMULATIVE <br />IMP ACTS AND SUMMARIZE ANY OTHER A V AILABLE INFORMATION <br />RELEVANT TO DETERMINING WHETHER THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR <br /> <br />Guidant Campus Master Plan <br />Draft AUAR <br /> <br />- 56- <br /> <br />September 2002 <br />