My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-15-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 10-15-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:28 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Duncan Clyborne, 1850 Glen Paul Avenue, stated he did not believe this <br />development was appropriate for this lot and requested the City follow their <br />zoning ordinances. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson, noted two story homes could be built five feet off the property line, <br />and if they sold this to a developer that built three homes on that lot, those homes <br />would impact the neighbors a lot more than this building proposal. He stated the <br />reason a fence would not work on top of a retaining wall was because they would <br />have no room for snow removal. He noted the decks were intended for visual <br />purposes only. He noted the neighbors knew there would be a commercial <br />development on that lot and this proposal should not come as any surprise to them. <br />He noted the existing neighbors already had buffering because of the location of <br />their garages. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski asked what the total height of the building being <br />proposed was. Mr. Nelson replied it would be 33 feet. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski asked how high the peaks of the homes in the <br />neighborhood were. Mr. Nelson replied the average height was approximately 20 <br />feet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated he would be willing to listen to further ideas from the Council <br />and staff. He agreed to table this issue for sixty days. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla noted the City could extend the deadline to sixty days only if they noted <br />the reason for the tabling. <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish noted the original plan was approved on December 10,2001 and if <br />nothing was done by that date, they would need to get an extension to that original <br />request. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski stated a business in a neighborhood should be used <br />by the neighbors and she did not believe the neighbors would use the proposed <br />tenants. She asked if the neighbors and the developer could in any way reach any <br />type of a compromise. . <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.