Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />with less than six weeks notice. The increase had no apparent relationship to the cost of <br />providing the service. <br /> <br />Response: State agencies should be required to demonstrate the need for increases in <br />service fees, and should give adequate notice of increases to allow local governments to <br />budget for the increases. State agencies should set administrative service fees as close as <br />possible to the marginal cost of providing the service. Local government should be given <br />the option to self-administer or contract with the private sector for the service if the state <br />cannot provide the service at a reasonable cost. <br /> <br />FF 21. Equity in Library Funding (GC) <br /> <br />Issue: Many community libraries in Minnesota are city owned. Although located in an <br />individual community, city libraries serve a much wider area. <br /> <br />Response: The League supports equity in availability of quality library services to <br />city and township residents. Accordingly, the League supports equity in local property tax <br />levies for libraries. In some Minnesota counties, there are wide disparities between city and <br />rural tax burdens for library services. There should be more equity in the property tax. <br /> <br />IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES <br /> <br />LE-1. Growth Management and Annexation (RS) <br /> <br />Issue: Unplanned and uncontrolled urban growth has a negative environmental, fiscal, <br />and governmental impact on cities, counties, and stale governments because it increases the cost <br />of providing government services and results in the loss of natural resource areas and prime <br />agricultural land. <br /> <br />Response: The League believes the existing framework for guiding growth and <br />development primarily through local plans and controls adopted by local governments <br />should form the basis of a statewide planning policy, and that the state should not adopt a <br />mandatory comprehensive statewide planning process. Rather, the state should: <br /> <br />· Provide additional fmancial and technical assistance to local governments for <br />cooperative planning and growth management issues, particularly where new <br />comprehensive plans have been mandated by the Legislature. <br /> <br />· Clearly establish the public purposes served by existing statewide controls such as shore <br />land zoning and wetlands conservation; clarify, simplify, and streamline these controls; <br />eliminate duplication in their administration; and fully defend and hold harmless any <br />local government sued for a "taking" as a result of executing state land use policies. <br /> <br />· Give cities broader authority to extend their zoning, subdivision, and other land-use <br />controls up to two miles outside the city's boundaries, regardless of the existence of <br />county or township controls, to ensure conformance with city facilities and services. <br /> <br />7 <br />